Abstract
AbstractEnvironmental conditions profoundly impact the health, welfare, and productivity of laying hens in commercial poultry farming. We investigated the association between microclimate variations, production indices, and histopathological responses to accidental Newcastle disease virus (NDV) infection within a controlled closed-house system. The study was conducted over seven months in a laying hen facility in Cairo, Egypt. Microclimate measurements included temperature, relative humidity (RH%), air velocity (AV), and the temperature humidity index (THI) that were obtained from specific locations on the front and back sides of the facility. Productivity indices, including the egg production percentage (EPP), egg weight (EW), average daily feed intake, and feed conversion ratio, were assessed monthly. During an NDV outbreak, humoral immune responses, gross pathology, and histopathological changes were evaluated. The results demonstrated significant (p < 0.05) variations in EPP and EW between the front and back sides except in April and May. AV had a significant (p = 0.006) positive effect (Beta = 0.346) on EW on the front side. On the back side, AV had a significant (p = 0.001) positive effect (Beta = 0.474) on EW, while it negatively influenced (p = 0.027) EPP (Beta = − 0.281). However, temperature, RH%, and THI had no impact and could not serve as predictors for EPP or EW on either farm side. The humoral immune response to NDV was consistent across microclimates, highlighting the resilience of hens. Histopathological examination revealed characteristic NDV-associated lesions, with no significant differences between the microclimates. This study underscores the significance of optimizing microclimate conditions to enhance laying performance by providing tailored environmental management strategies based on seasonal variations, ensuring consistent airflow, particularly near cooling pads and exhaust fans, and reinforcing the importance of biosecurity measures under field challenges with continuous monitoring and adjustment.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference40 articles.
1. Kocaman, B., Esenbuga, N., Yildiz, A., Laçin, E. & Macit, M. Effect of environmental conditions in poultry houses on the performance of laying hens. Int. J. Poult. Sci. 5, 26–30 (2006).
2. Magazine, S. Climate Variation: Pests and Diseases 5–6 (Spore Magazine, August Special Issue: CTA, 2008).
3. Wahyuningrum, H., Mahfudz, L. D. & Muryani, R. Macroclimate at different altitudes on changes in microclimates in a closed house. J. Sain Peternak. Indones. 17, 126–133 (2022).
4. Widjaya, N. et al. The effect of closed house density near the outlet on the production of carcass, non-carcass, and abdominal fat of finisher broilers. Anim. Prod. 25, 118–122 (2023).
5. Sudjarwo, E., Muharlien, M., Sjofjan, O., Adli, D. N. & Yulianti, D. L. The effects of cage location on hy-line laying hens growth performance, microcli-mate, nh 3 and co 2 concentration, and dust particle. Adv. Anim. Vet. Sci 11, 65–71 (2023).