Author:
Yoon Dan,Yoo Mira,Kim Byeong Soo,Kim Young Gyun,Lee Jong Hyeon,Lee Eunju,Min Guan Hong,Hwang Du-Yeong,Baek Changhoon,Cho Minwoo,Suh Yun-Suhk,Kim Sungwan
Abstract
AbstractThe intraoperative estimated blood loss (EBL), an essential parameter for perioperative management, has been evaluated by manually weighing blood in gauze and suction bottles, a process both time-consuming and labor-intensive. As the novel EBL prediction platform, we developed an automated deep learning EBL prediction model, utilizing the patch-wise crumpled state (P-W CS) of gauze images with texture analysis. The proposed algorithm was developed using animal data obtained from a porcine experiment and validated on human intraoperative data prospectively collected from 102 laparoscopic gastric cancer surgeries. The EBL prediction model involves gauze area detection and subsequent EBL regression based on the detected areas, with each stage optimized through comparative model performance evaluations. The selected gauze detection model demonstrated a sensitivity of 96.5% and a specificity of 98.0%. Based on this detection model, the performance of EBL regression stage models was compared. Comparative evaluations revealed that our P-W CS-based model outperforms others, including one reliant on convolutional neural networks and another analyzing the gauze’s overall crumpled state. The P-W CS-based model achieved a mean absolute error (MAE) of 0.25 g and a mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) of 7.26% in EBL regression. Additionally, per-patient assessment yielded an MAE of 0.58 g, indicating errors < 1 g/patient. In conclusion, our algorithm provides an objective standard and streamlined approach for EBL estimation during surgery without the need for perioperative approximation and additional tasks by humans. The robust performance of the model across varied surgical conditions emphasizes its clinical potential for real-world application.
Funder
Korea Medical Device Development Fund
Seoul National University Hospital
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference40 articles.
1. Blosser, C., Smith, A. & Poole, A. T. Quantification of blood loss improves detection of postpartum hemorrhage and accuracy of postpartum hemorrhage rates: A retrospective cohort study. Cureus 13(2), e13591 (2021).
2. Tran, A. et al. Techniques for blood loss estimation in major non-cardiac surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Can. J. Anesth./J. Can. Anesth. 68, 245–255 (2021).
3. Saleh, A., Ihedioha, U., Babu, B., Evans, J. & Kang, P. Is estimated intra-operative blood loss a reliable predictor of surgical outcomes in laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery?. Scott. Med. J. 61, 167–170 (2016).
4. Piekarski, F. et al. Quantification of intraoperative blood losses. Anästh. Intensiv. Med. 61, 110–116 (2020).
5. Mizuno, A. et al. Adverse effects of intraoperative blood loss on long-term outcomes after curative gastrectomy of patients with stage II/III gastric cancer. Dig. Surg. 33, 121–128 (2016).