Author:
Kim Chang Jo,Yuan Xiu,Kim Min,Kyung Kee Sung,Noh Hyun Ho
Abstract
AbstractThis study aimed to investigate the residual characteristics of pesticides drifted by unmanned aerial spray according to buffer strip, windbreak, and morphological characteristics of non-target crops, suggest prevention for drift reduction, and finally conduct a risk analysis on pesticides exceeding the maximum residue limit (MRL) or uniform level (0.01 mg/kg) of the positive list system (PLS). Non-target crops were collected around the aerial sprayed area (paddy rice) in Boryeong, Seocheon, and Pyeongtaek after UAV spray. When pesticides were detected in more than three samples, Duncan’s multiple range test was performed. In cases where pesticides were detected in only two samples, an independent sample t-test was conducted (p < 0.05). The drift rate of pesticides tends to decrease by up to 100% as the buffer distance from aerial sprayed area increases or when a windbreak, such as maize, is present between two locations. Thus, the reduction of drifted pesticides could be effective if both factors were applied near the UAV spray area. Moreover, the residue of drifted pesticides was found to be the highest in leafy vegetables such as perilla leaves or leaf and stem vegetables such as Welsh onion, followed by fruit vegetables and cucurbits, owing to the morphological characteristics of crops. Therefore, selecting pulse or cereal such as soybean or maize as a farm product near the UAV spray area can be considered to minimize the drift. For pesticides that exceed the MRL or PLS uniform level, %acceptable dietary intake is 0–0.81% with no risk. Additionally, employing pesticides approved for both paddy rice and farm products in UAV spraying can effectively minimize instances where MRL or PLS are exceeded. Therefore, this study aims to provide farmers with effective guidelines for mitigating drift. Furthermore, we strive to promote stable and uninterrupted food production while facilitating the utilization of agricultural technologies such as UAV spraying to address labor shortages and ensure sustainable food security.
Funder
Agricultural Research and Development Program, National Institute of Agricultural Sciences (NAS), Rural development administration (RDA), Republic of Korea.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference64 articles.
1. Tudi, M. et al. Agriculture development, pesticide application and its impact on the environment. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 18(3), 1112. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18031112 (2021).
2. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nation (FAO). Pesticides use, pesticides trade and pesticides indicators: Global, regional and country trends, 1990–2020. FAOSTAT Anal. Brief. 46 FAO. Rome, Italy, 9. Rome. https://doi.org/10.4060/cc0918en (2022).
3. Damalas, C. A. & Eleftherohorinos, I. G. Pesticide exposure, safety issues, and risk assessment indicators. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 8(5), 1402–1419. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph8051402 (2011).
4. Hunter, M. C., Smith, R. G., Schipanski, M. E., Atwood, L. W. & Mortensen, D. A. Agriculture in 2050: Recalibrating targets for sustainable intensification. Bioscience 67(4), 386–391. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/bix010 (2017).
5. Ministry of Government Legislation (MOLEG). Agricultural Chemicals Regulation Law. https://www.law.go.kr/LSW/lsSc.do?menuId=1&dt=20201211&query=%EB%86%8D%EC%95%BD%EA%B4%80%EB%A6%AC%EB%B2%95&subMenuId=15# (2023).
Cited by
9 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献