Gaze behavior in open-angle glaucoma patients during visuo-cognitive-motor tasks: a cross-sectional study

Author:

Freitag Constantin W.,Behrens Martin,Bielitzki Robert,Al-Nosairy Khaldoon O.,Stolle Francie H.,Prabhakaran Gokulraj T.,Beyer Rosalie,Thieme Hagen,Hoffmann Michael B.,Schega Lutz

Abstract

AbstractThis study investigated gaze behavior during visuo-cognitive-motor tasks with a change of movement direction in glaucoma patients and healthy controls. Nineteen glaucoma patients (10 females, 9 males) and 30 healthy sighted controls (17 females, 13 males) participated in this cross-sectional study. Participants performed two visuo-cognitive-motor tasks with a change of movement direction: (i) the “Speed-Court-Test” that involved stepping on different sensors in response to a visual sign displayed on either a large or small screen (165″ and 55″, respectively); (ii) the “Trail-Walking-Test” that required walking to 15 cones labeled with numbers (1–8) or letters (A-G) in an alternately ascending order. During these tasks, the time needed for completing each task was determined and the gaze behavior (e.g., saccade duration, fixation duration) was recorded via eye tracking. Data were analyzed with repeated measures analyses of covariance (ANCOVA; GROUP × SCREEN) and one-way ANCOVA. No differences between groups were found for the time needed to complete the tasks. However, during the “Trail-Walking-Test”, the fixation duration was longer for glaucoma patients than for controls (p = 0.016, $${\upeta }_{\text{p}}^{2}$$ η p 2  = 0.131). Furthermore, during the “Speed-Court-Test”, there was a screen size effect. Irrespective of group, saccade amplitudes were lower (p < 0.001, $${\upeta }_{\text{p}}^{2}$$ η p 2  = 0.242) and fixation durations were higher (p = 0.021, $${\upeta }_{\text{p}}^{2}$$ η p 2  = 0.125) for the small screen. Fixation durations were longer in glaucoma patients during the cognitively demanding “Trail-Walking-Test”, which might indicate a strategy to compensate for their visual impairment.

Funder

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft

Otto-von-Guericke-Universität Magdeburg

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3