Estimating mouse and rat use in American laboratories by extrapolation from Animal Welfare Act-regulated species

Author:

Carbone Larry

Abstract

AbstractAlone among Western nations, the United States has a two-tier system for welfare protections for vertebrate animals in research. Because its Animal Welfare Act (AWA) excludes laboratory rats and mice (RM), government veterinarians do not inspect RM laboratories and RM numbers are only partially reported to government agencies1. Without transparent statistics, it is impossible to track efforts to reduce or replace these sentient animals’ use or to project government resources needed if AWA coverage were expanded to include them. I obtained annual RM usage data from 16 large American institutions and compared RM numbers to institutions’ legally-required reports of their AWA-covered mammals. RM comprised approximately 99.3% of mammals at these representative institutions. Extrapolating from 780,070 AWA-covered mammals in 2017–18, I estimate that 111.5 million rats and mice were used per year in this period. If the same proportion of RM undergo painful procedures as are publicly reported for AWA-covered animals, then some 44.5 million mice and rats underwent potentially painful experiments. These data inform the questions of whether the AWA needs an update to cover RM, or whether the NIH should increase transparency of funded animal research. These figures can benchmark progress in reducing animal numbers in general and more specifically, in painful experiments. This estimate is higher than any others available, reflecting the challenges of obtaining statistics without consistent and transparent institutional reports.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Multidisciplinary

Reference28 articles.

1. Carbone, L. What Animals Want: Expertise and Advocacy in Laboratory Animal Welfare Policy 291 pp (Oxford University Press, New York, 2004).

2. Schipani, S. The history of the lab rat is full of scientific triumphs and ethical quandaries. Smithsonian Magazine. February 27 2019. https://www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/history-lab-rat-scientific-triumphs-ethical-quandaries-180971533/ (2019).

3. Taylor, K., Gordon, N., Langley, G. & Higgins, W. Estimates for worldwide laboratory animal use in 2005. Altern. Lab. Anim. ATLA 36, 327–342 (2008).

4. Taylor, K. & Alvarez, L. R. An estimate of the number of animals used for scientific purposes worldwide in 2015. Altern. Lab. Anim. ATLA 47, 196–213 (2019).

5. Kattsnellson, A. BBC Future. Will We Ever … Eliminate Animal Experimentation? https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20130609-will-we-ever-end-animal-testing. Accessed 4 Apr 2020 (2013).

Cited by 46 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3