Author:
Wu Yina,Zhang Yichao,Zou Xu,Yuan Zhenming,Hu Wensheng,Lu Sha,Sun Xiaoyan,Wu Yingfei
Abstract
AbstractAn accurate estimated date of delivery (EDD) helps pregnant women make adequate preparations before delivery and avoid the panic of parturition. EDD is normally derived from some formulates or estimated by doctors based on last menstruation period and ultrasound examinations. This study attempted to combine antenatal examinations and electronic medical records to develop a hybrid model based on Gradient Boosting Decision Tree and Gated Recurrent Unit (GBDT-GRU). Besides exploring the features that affect the EDD, GBDT-GRU model obtained the results by dynamic prediction of different stages. The mean square error (MSE) and coefficient of determination (R2) were used to compare the performance among the different prediction methods. In addition, we evaluated predictive performances of different prediction models by comparing the proportion of pregnant women under the error of different days. Experimental results showed that the performance indexes of hybrid GBDT-GRU model outperformed other prediction methods because it focuses on analyzing the time-series predictors of pregnancy. The results of this study are helpful for the development of guidelines for clinical delivery treatments, as it can assist clinicians in making correct decisions during obstetric examinations.
Funder
Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province in China
Primary Research and Development Plan of Zhejiang Province in China
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference38 articles.
1. Nguyen, T. H., Larsen, T., Engholm, G. & Møller, H. Evaluation of ultrasound-estimated date of delivery in 17 450 spontaneous singleton births: do we need to modify Naegele’s rule?. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. Off. J. Int. Soc. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 14, 23–28 (1999).
2. Barr, W. B. & Pecci, C. C. Last menstrual period versus ultrasound for pregnancy dating. Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet. 87, 38–39 (2004).
3. Shuang, L. I. A. N. G. & Xiao-tian, L. I. Advances in gestational age estimating based on last menstrual period and ultrasound. J. Int. Obstet. Gynecol. 41, 448 (2014).
4. Morales Rosello, J., Hervas Marin, D. & Perales Marin, A. Can we predict delivery date with obstetric ultrasound?. J. Maternal-Fetal Neonatal Med. 26, 1807–1811 (2013).
5. Lawson, G. W. Naegele’s rule and the length of pregnancy: a review. Aust. N. Zeal. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 61, 177–182 (2021).
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Prediction of SO2, NOx and PM in the sintering process based on deep learning;Ironmaking & Steelmaking: Processes, Products and Applications;2024-09-09