Author:
Enock Florence E.,Hewstone Miles R. C.,Lockwood Patricia L.,Sui Jie
Abstract
Abstract
Cognitive biases shape our perception of the world and our interactions with other people. Information related to the self and our social ingroups is prioritised for cognitive processing and can therefore form some of these key biases. However, ingroup biases may be elicited not only for established social groups, but also for minimal groups assigned by novel or random social categorisation. Moreover, whether these ‘ingroup biases’ are related to self-processing is unknown. Across three experiments, we utilised a social associative matching paradigm to examine whether the cognitive mechanisms underpinning the effects of minimal groups overlapped with those that prioritise the self, and whether minimal group allocation causes early processing advantages. We found significant advantages in response time and sensitivity (dprime) for stimuli associated with newly-assigned ingroups. Further, self-biases and ingroup-biases were positively correlated across individuals (Experiments 1 and 3). However, when the task was such that ingroup and self associations competed, only the self-advantage was detected (Experiment 2). These results demonstrate that even random group allocation quickly captures attention and enhances processing. Positive correlations between the self- and ingroup-biases suggest a common cognitive mechanism across individuals. These findings have implications for understanding how social biases filter our perception of the world.
Funder
Defence Science and Technology Laboratory
Medical Research Council
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference57 articles.
1. Farnham, S. D., Greenwald, A. G. & Banaji, M. R. Implicit self-esteem. in Social Identity and Social Cognition 230–248 (Blackwell Publishing, 1999).
2. Pelham, B. W., Carvallo, M. & Jones, J. T. Implicit egotism. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 14, 106–110 (2005).
3. Beggan, J. K. On the social nature of nonsocial perception: The mere ownership effect. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 62, 229–237 (1992).
4. Knetsch, J. L. The endowment effect and evidence of nonreversible indifference curves. Am. Econ. Rev. 79, 1277–1284 (1989).
5. Knetsch, J. L. & Sinden, J. A. Willingness to pay and compensation demanded: Experimental evidence of an unexpected disparity in measures of value. Q. J. Econ. 99, 507–521 (1984).
Cited by
8 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献