Author:
Jiang Xiaoli,Xiao Daiwen,Yu Hua,Sun Anhua,Liu Qin,Liu Tao
Abstract
AbstractIn order to obtain the best mass spectrometry identification results for using the most appropriate methods in clinical practice, we explore the optimal pretreatment methods for different species and morphologies of filamentous fungi. 98 fungal strains were treated with formic acid sandwich method, dispersion method, extraction method, and other methods using a medium element mass spectrometer (EXS3000) as a platform. Each strain had three targets, and the identification rates and confidence differences under different pre-treatment methods were compared to evaluate the identification effects of these methods. The mass spectrometry identification rates of 98 filamentous fungi obtained after pre-treatment with formic acid sandwich method, dispersion method, and extraction method were 85.71%, 82.65%, and 75.51%, respectively. The identification rate of the formic acid sandwich method was significantly higher than the other two methods (P < 0 005) has the best identification ability and the obtained confidence is also higher than the other two methods. The use of formic acid sandwich method for mass spectrometry identification of filamentous fungi can achieve ideal identification results, which is suitable for mass spectrometry identification of filamentous fungi in conventional laboratories.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference13 articles.
1. Masih, A. et al. Identification by molecular methods and matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry and antifungal susceptibility profiles of clinically significant rare Asper gillus species in referral chest hospital in Delhi, India. J. Clin. Microbiol. 54(9), 2354–2364 (2016).
2. Al-Hatmi, A. M. S., Meis, J. F. & de Hoog, G. S. Fusarium: Molecular diversity and intrinsic drug resistance. PLoS Pathog. 12(4), e1005464 (2016).
3. Wang, H. et al. Molecular identification and sus-ceptibility of clinically relevant Scedosporium pp. in China. Biomed. Res. Int. 2015, 109656 (2015).
4. Guo, P. & LiaoWu, K. Z. Laboratory detection methods for invasive pulmonary fungal infection. Chin. J. Clin. New Med. 14(3), 225–230 (2021).
5. Lass-Florl, C., Samardzic, E. & Knoll, M. Serology anno 2021-fungal infections: From invasive to chronic. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 27(9), 1230–41 (2021).