Author:
Tong Jiayi,Duan Rui,Li Ruowang,Luo Chongliang,Moore Jason H.,Zhu Jingsan,Foster Gary D.,Volpp Kevin G.,Yancy William S.,Shaw Pamela A.,Chen Yong
Abstract
AbstractIn response to the escalating global obesity crisis and its associated health and financial burdens, this paper presents a novel methodology for analyzing longitudinal weight loss data and assessing the effectiveness of financial incentives. Drawing from the Keep It Off trial—a three-arm randomized controlled study with 189 participants—we examined the potential impact of financial incentives on weight loss maintenance. Given that some participants choose not to weigh themselves because of small weight change or weight gains, which is a common phenomenon in many weight-loss studies, traditional methods, for example, the Generalized Estimating Equations (GEE) method tends to overestimate the effect size due to the assumption that data are missing completely at random. To address this challenge, we proposed a framework which can identify evidence of missing not at random and conduct bias correction using the estimating equation derived from pairwise composite likelihood. By analyzing the Keep It Off data, we found that the data in this trial are most likely characterized by non-random missingness. Notably, we also found that the enrollment time (i.e., duration time) would be positively associated with the weight loss maintenance after adjusting for the baseline participant characteristics (e.g., age, sex). Moreover, the lottery-based intervention was found to be more effective in weight loss maintenance compared with the direct payment intervention, though the difference was non-statistically significant. This framework's significance extends beyond weight loss research, offering a semi-parametric approach to assess missing data mechanisms and robustly explore associations between exposures (e.g., financial incentives) and key outcomes (e.g., weight loss maintenance). In essence, the proposed methodology provides a powerful toolkit for analyzing real-world longitudinal data, particularly in scenarios with data missing not at random, enriching comprehension of intricate dataset dynamics.
Funder
National Institutes of Health
Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference38 articles.
1. FastStats—Overweight Prevalence. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/obesity-overweight.htm (accessed 24 Jul 2021).
2. Adult Obesity Prevalence Maps | Overweight & Obesity | CDC. https://www.cdc.gov/obesity/data/prevalence-maps.html (accessed 27 Aug 2023).
3. Adult Obesity Facts | Overweight & Obesity | CDC. https://www.cdc.gov/obesity/data/adult.html (accessed 27 Aug 2023).
4. Ward, Z. J. et al. Association of body mass index with health care expenditures in the United States by age and sex. PLoS ONE https://doi.org/10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0247307 (2022).
5. Flegal, K. M. et al. Prevalence and trends in obesity among US adults, 1999–2000. JAMA 288, 1723–1727 (2002).
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献