The quest for the reliability of machine learning models in binary classification on tabular data

Author:

Araujo Santos Vitor Cirilo,Cardoso Lucas,Alves Ronnie

Abstract

AbstractIn this paper we explore the reliability of contexts of machine learning (ML) models. There are several evaluation procedures commonly used to validate a model (precision, F1 Score and others); However, these procedures are not linked to the evaluation of learning itself, but only to the number of correct answers presented by the model. This characteristic makes it impossible to assess whether a model was able to learn through elements that make sense of the context in which it is inserted. Therefore, the model could achieves good results in the training stage but poor results when the model needs to be generalized. When there are many different models that achieve similar performance, the model that presented the highest number of hits in training does not mean that this model is the best. Therefore, we created a methodology based on Item Response Theory that allows us to identify whether an ML context is unreliable, providing an extra and different validation for ML models.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Multidisciplinary

Reference21 articles.

1. Darrell, T., Kloft, M., Pontil, M., Rätsch, G. & Rodner, E. Machine learning with interdependent and non-identically distributed data. Dagstuhl Rep.https://doi.org/10.4230/DagRep.5.4.18 (2015).

2. Geirhos, R. et al. Shortcut learning in deep neural networks. Nat. Mach. Intell. 2, 665–673. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-020-00257-z (2020).

3. D’Amour, A. et al. Underspecification presents challenges for credibility in modern machine learning. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 23, 10237–10297 (2020).

4. Ortiz-Jiménez, G., Salazar-Reque, I. F., Modas, A., Moosavi-Dezfooli, S. & Frossard, P. A neural anisotropic view of underspecification in deep learning. CoRR (2021). arXiv:2104.14372.

5. Baier, L., Jöhren, F. & Seebacher, S. Challenges in the deployment and operation of machine learning in practice. In ECIS 2019 proceedings . 27th European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS), Stockholm & Uppsala, Sweden, June 8–14, 2019. Research Papers, Paper: 163 (AIS eLibrary (AISeL), 2019).

Cited by 5 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3