Author:
Lee Yunwoo,Kim Heesoo,Min Seongi,Yoon Hyungchul
Abstract
AbstractThe structural condition can be estimated by various methods. Damage detection, as one of those methods, deals with identifying changes in specific features within structural behavior based on numerical models. Since the method is based on simulation for various damage conditions, there are limitations in applicability due to inevitable discrepancies between the analytical model and the actual structure. Finite element model updating is a technique for establishing a finite element model that can reflect the current state of a target structure based on the measured responses. It is performed based on optimization for various structural parameters, but the final output can converge differently depending on the initial model and the characteristics of the algorithm. Although the updated model may not faithfully replicate the target structure as it is, it can be considered equivalent in terms of the relationship between the structural properties and behavioral characteristics of the target. This allows for the analysis of changes in the mechanical relationships established for the target structure. The change can be related to structural damage, and artificial intelligence technology can provide an alternative solution in such complex problems where analytical approaches are challenging. Taking practical aspects from the aforementioned methods, a novel structural damage detection methodology is presented in this study for identifying the location and extent of the damage. Model updating is used to establish a reference model that reflects the structural characteristics of the target. Training data for various damage conditions based on the reference model allows the artificial intelligence networks to identify damage to the target structure.
Funder
National Research Foundation of Korea
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference59 articles.
1. Phares, B. M., Rolander, D. D., Graybeal, B. A. & Washer, G. A. Studying the reliability of bridge inspection. Public Roads 64, 15–19 (2000).
2. Rolander, D., Phares, B., Graybeal, B., Moore, M. & Washer, G. Highway bridge inspection: State-of-the-practice survey. Transp. Res. Rec. 1749, 73–81 (2001).
3. Graybeal, B. A., Phares, B. M., Rolander, D. D., Moore, M. & Washer, G. Visual inspection of highway bridges. J. Nondestr. Eval. 21, 67–83 (2002).
4. Lynch, J. P. & Loh, K. J. A summary review of wireless sensors and sensor networks for structural health monitoring. Shock Vib. Dig. 38, 91–130 (2006).
5. Shen, N. et al. A review of global navigation satellite system (GNSS)-based dynamic monitoring technologies for structural health monitoring. Remote Sens. 11, 1001 (2019).
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献