Author:
Khan Tabassum,Rizvi Moattar Raza,Sharma Ankita,Ahmad Fuzail,Hasan Shahnaz,Uddin Shadab,Sidiq Mohammad,Ammari Areej,Iqbal Amir,Alghadir Ahmad H.
Abstract
AbstractPain in the lower back is a major concern in today’s era due to prolonged sitting in two-wheeler riders, mainly due to hamstring tightness. It also creates physical disability and impairment in activities of daily living. The study aimed to compare the efficacy of muscle energy technique (MET) and self-myofascial release (SMFR) using the foam roller on hamstring flexibility, dynamic balance, and physical disability amongst two-wheeler riders with chronic low back pain (LBP). Participants were randomized into two intervention groups, MET and SMFR using the envelope method, with each group having 20 participants. Hamstring flexibility and range of motion for knee extension and the lower back were assessed using the active knee extension test (AKE-L and AKE-R) and sit and reach test (SRT), while the dynamic balance was assessed by the star excursion balance test (SEBT) and physical disability by Roland‐Morris Disability Questionnaire, (RMDQ). Measurements were taken at baseline and after 4 weeks of intervention. This study demonstrated that both SMFR using a foam roller and MET are effective in enhancing hamstring muscle flexibility, (SRT—F(1, 38) = 299.5, p < 0.001; AKE-R—F(1, 38) = 99.53, p < 0.001; AKE-L—F(1, 38) = 89.67, p < 0.001). Additionally, these techniques significantly improved dynamic balance in various directions, including anterior (ANT), anteromedial (AMED), medial (MED), posteromedial (PMED), posterior (POST), posterolateral (PLAT), lateral (LAT), and anterolateral (ALAT) directions (p < 0.01). Furthermore, there was a significant reduction in physical disability (RMDQ—F(1, 38) = 1307, p < 0.001), among two-wheeler riders suffering from chronic LBP. Compared to MET, SMFR using foam rollers was found to be more effective in enhancing hamstring flexibility, improving balance, and decreasing disability level on the RMDQ after 4 weeks.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference40 articles.
1. Dunn, K. M., Hestbaek, L. & Cassidy, J. D. Low back pain across the life course. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Rheumatol. 27, 591–600 (2013).
2. Froud, R. et al. A systematic review and meta-synthesis of the impact of low back pain on people’s lives. BMC Musculoskelet. Disord. 15, 1–14 (2014).
3. Dhargalkar, P., Kulkarni, A. & Ghodey, S. Added effect of muscle energy technique for improving functional ability in patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain. Int. J. Physiother. Res. 5, 2082–2087 (2017).
4. Memon, A., Imran, A., Aftab, S., Nawaz, U. & Ishaque, F. Low back pain among student motorcyclists: A cross-sectional study. J. Dow Univ. Health Sci. (JDUHS) 13, 113–116 (2019).
5. Odebiyi, D. O., Ogwezi, D. & Adegoke, B. The prevalence of low back pain in commercial motor drivers and private automobile drivers. Nigerian J. Med. Rehab. 1, 21–24 (2007).