Author:
Leong Edwin,Al-Bitar Haya,Marshall Jean S.,Bezuhly Michael
Abstract
AbstractFibrosis is a destructive, end-stage disease process. In the skin, it is associated with systemic sclerosis and scarring with considerable health burden. Ketotifen is a clinical antihistamine and mast cell stabilizer. Studies have demonstrated mast cell-dependent anti-fibrotic effects of ketotifen but direct effects on fibroblasts have not been determined. Human dermal fibroblasts were treated with pro-fibrotic transforming growth factor-β1 (TGFβ) followed by ketotifen or control treatments to determine direct effects on fibrotic fibroblasts. Ketotifen impaired TGFβ-induced α-smooth muscle actin gene and protein responses and decreased cytoskeletal- and contractility-associated gene responses associated with fibrosis. Ketotifen reduced Yes-associated protein phosphorylation, transcriptional coactivator with PDZ binding motif transcript and protein levels, and phosphorylation of protein kinase B. In a fibroblast-populated collagen gel contraction assay, ketotifen reduced the contractile activity of TGFβ-activated fibroblasts. In a murine model of bleomycin-induced skin fibrosis, collagen density and dermal thickness were significantly decreased in ketotifen-treated mice supporting in vitro findings. These results support a novel, direct anti-fibrotic activity of ketotifen, reducing pro-fibrotic phenotypic changes in fibroblasts and reducing collagen fibres in fibrotic mouse skin. Together, these findings suggest novel therapeutic potential and a novel mechanism of action for ketotifen in the context of fibrosis.
Funder
Dalhousie Medical Research Foundation
Faculty of Medicine, Dalhousie University
Canadian Institutes of Health Research
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference84 articles.
1. Wynn, T. A. Cellular and molecular mechanisms of fibrosis. J. Pathol. 214, 199–210 (2008).
2. Wynn, T. A. & Ramalingam, T. R. Mechanisms of fibrosis: Therapeutic translation for fibrotic disease. Nat. Med. 18, 1028–1040 (2012).
3. Muhl, L. et al. Single-cell analysis uncovers fibroblast heterogeneity and criteria for fibroblast and mural cell identification and discrimination. Nat. Commun. 111, 1–18 (2020).
4. Lynch, M. D. & Watt, F. M. Fibroblast heterogeneity: Implications for human disease. J. Clin. Invest. 128, 26–35 (2018).
5. D’Urso, M. & Kurniawan, N. A. Mechanical and physical regulation of fibroblast-myofibroblast transition: From cellular mechanoresponse to tissue pathology. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 8, 1–15 (2020).