Author:
Stoitsas Kostas,Bahulikar Saurabh,de Munter Leonie,de Jongh Mariska A. C.,Jansen Maria A. C.,Jung Merel M.,van Wingerden Marijn,Van Deun Katrijn
Abstract
AbstractPredicting recovery after trauma is important to provide patients a perspective on their estimated future health, to engage in shared decision making and target interventions to relevant patient groups. In the present study, several unsupervised techniques are employed to cluster patients based on longitudinal recovery profiles. Subsequently, these data-driven clusters were assessed on clinical validity by experts and used as targets in supervised machine learning models. We present a formalised analysis of the obtained clusters that incorporates evaluation of (i) statistical and machine learning metrics, (ii) clusters clinical validity with descriptive statistics and medical expertise. Clusters quality assessment revealed that clusters obtained through a Bayesian method (High Dimensional Supervised Classification and Clustering) and a Deep Gaussian Mixture model, in combination with oversampling and a Random Forest for supervised learning of the cluster assignments provided among the most clinically sensible partitioning of patients. Other methods that obtained higher classification accuracy suffered from cluster solutions with large majority classes or clinically less sensible classes. Models that used just physical or a mix of physical and psychological outcomes proved to be among the most sensible, suggesting that clustering on psychological outcomes alone yields recovery profiles that do not conform to known risk factors.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference56 articles.
1. Alonzo, T. A. Clinical prediction models: A practical approach to development, validation, and updating: by Ewout W. Steyerberg (2009).
2. Moons, K. G., Royston, P., Vergouwe, Y., Grobbee, D. E. & Altman, D. G. Prognosis and prognostic research: what, why, and how?. BMJ 338, b606 (2009).
3. Organization, W. H. et al. Injuries and violence: the facts 2014 (2014).
4. LNAZ. Traumazorg in Beeld; annual report of the Dutch trauma registry 2015–2019 (2020).
5. Lee, Y.-H., Bang, H. & Kim, D. J. How to establish clinical prediction models. Endocrinol. Metab. 31, 38–44 (2016).
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献