Abstract
AbstractThe novel coronavirus outbreak began in late December 2019 and rapidly spread worldwide, critically impacting public health systems. A number of already approved and marketed drugs are being tested for repurposing, including Favipiravir. We aim to investigate the efficacy and safety of Favipiravir in treatment of COVID-19 patients through a systematic review and meta-analysis. This systematic review and meta-analysis were reported in accordance with the PRISMA statement. We registered the protocol in the PROSPERO (CRD42020180032). All clinical trials which addressed the safety and efficacy of Favipiravir in comparison to other control groups for treatment of patients with confirmed infection with SARS-CoV2 were included. We searched electronic databases including LitCovid/PubMed, Scopus, Web of Sciences, Cochrane, and Scientific Information Database up to 31 December 2020. We assessed the risk of bias of the included studies using Cochrane Collaboration criteria. All analyses were performed using the Comprehensive Meta-Analysis software version 2, and the risk ratio index was calculated. Egger and Begg test was used for assessing publication bias. Nine studies were included in our meta-analysis. The results of the meta-analysis revealed a significant clinical improvement in the Favipiravir group versus the control group during seven days after hospitalization (RR = 1.24, 95% CI: 1.09–1.41; P = 0.001). Viral clearance was more in 14 days after hospitalization in Favipiravir group than control group, but this finding marginally not significant (RR = 1.11, 95% CI: 0.98–1.25; P = 0.094). Requiring supplemental oxygen therapy in the Favipiravir group was 7% less than the control group, (RR = 0.93, 95% CI: 0.67–1.28; P = 0.664). Transferred to ICU and adverse events were not statistically different between two groups. The mortality rate in the Favipiravir group was approximately 30% less than the control group, but this finding not statistically significant. Favipiravir possibly exerted no significant beneficial effect in the term of mortality in the general group of patients with mild to moderate COVID-19. We should consider that perhaps the use of antiviral once the patient has symptoms is too late and this would explain their low efficacy in the clinical setting.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference43 articles.
1. Arab-Zozani, M. & Hassanipour, S. Features and limitations of LitCovid hub for quick access to literature about COVID-19. Balkan. Med. J. 37, 231. https://doi.org/10.4274/balkanmedj.galenos.2020.2020.4.67 (2020).
2. Fact Sheet for "the Biopharmaceutical Industry Leading the Way in Developing New Vaccines and Treatments for COVID-19" Available at: https://phrma.org/Coronavirus (2021).
3. Arab-Zozani, M., Hassanipour, S. & Ghoddoosi-Nejad, D. Favipiravir for treating patients with novel coronavirus (COVID-19): Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials. BMJ. Open. 10, e039730. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039730 (2020).
4. Food, U. & Administration, D. Fact Sheet for Health Care Providers Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) of Veklury® (remdesivir). (2020).
5. Rubin, D., Chan-Tack, K., Farley, J., Sherwat, A. FDA approval of remdesivir—a step in the right direction. New Engl. J. Med. 383, 2598–2600. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp2032369 (2020).
Cited by
214 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献