Author:
Albelasy Eman H.,Hamama Hamdi H.,Chew Hooi Pin,Montaser Marmar,Mahmoud Salah H.
Abstract
AbstractThis systematic review was aimed to evaluate occurrence of secondary caries and marginal adaptation in ion-releasing materials versus resin composite. Electronic search of PubMed, Scopus, and Open Grey databases with no date or language restrictions until May 21st, 2021, was conducted. Randomized clinical trials that compared ion-releasing restorations versus resin composite were included. For quantitative analysis, a random-effects meta-analysis with risk difference as an effect measure and a 95% confidence interval was used. Quality of evidence was assessed using The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation criteria. The risk of bias was evaluated using the Cochran Collaboration Risk of Bias tool. The inclusion criteria were met by 22 studies, and 10 studies were included in the meta-analysis. Three follow-up periods (1 year, 18 months–2 years, and 3 years) were evaluated. The overall quality of evidence for secondary caries and marginal adaptation outcomes was low. The results of the meta-analysis showed no significant difference (p > 0.05) in both outcomes between ion-releasing materials and resin composite. The occurrence of secondary caries was not dependent on the nature of the restorative material. It is more likely a complex process that involves the same risk factors as primary carious lesions.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference95 articles.
1. van Dijken, J. W. & Pallesen, U. A randomized 10-year prospective follow-up of Class II nanohybrid and conventional hybrid resin composite restorations. J. Adhes. Dent. 16, 585–592. https://doi.org/10.3290/j.jad.a33202 (2014).
2. van Dijken, J. W. & Pallesen, U. Randomized 3-year clinical evaluation of Class I and II posterior resin restorations placed with a bulk-fill resin composite and a one-step self-etching adhesive. J. Adhes. Dent. 17, 81. https://doi.org/10.3290/j.jad.a33502 (2015).
3. Barata, J. S. et al. Influence of gaps in adhesive restorations in the development of secondary caries lesions: An in situ evaluation. Am. J. Dent. 25, 244–248 (2012).
4. Da Rosa Rodolpho, P. A. et al. 22-Year clinical evaluation of the performance of two posterior composites with different filler characteristics. Dent. Mater. 27, 955–963. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2011.06.001 (2011).
5. Kramer, N. et al. Determination of caries risk at resin composite margins. Am. J. Dent. 20, 59–64 (2007).
Cited by
13 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献