Extended infusion of piperacillin–tazobactam versus intermittent infusion in critically ill egyptian patients: a cost-effectiveness study

Abstract

AbstractExtended infusion of piperacillin/tazobactam over 4 h has been proposed as an alternate mode of administration to the 30-min intermittent infusion to optimize treatment effects in patients with gram-negative bacterial infections. The study aimed to evaluate the extended infusion regimen of piperacillin/tazobactam in standings of efficacy, safety, and cost to the intermittent one in the treatment of gram-negative bacterial infections. A prospective randomized comparative study was performed on 53 patients, 27 in the intermittent infusion group and 26 in the extended infusion group. The primary outcome was the mean number of days to clinical success and the percentage of patients who were clinically cured after treatment. The secondary outcomes included mortality, readmission within 30-days, and cost-effectiveness analysis based on the mean number of days to clinical success. The clinical success rate was comparable in the two groups. Days on extended infusion were significantly lower than intermittent infusion (5.7 vs 8.9 days, respectively, p = 0.0001) as well as days to clinical success (4.6 vs 8.5 days, respectively, p = 0.026). The extended infusion was superior to the intermittent infusion regarding cost-effectiveness ratio ($1835.41 and $1914.09/expected success, respectively). The more cost-effective regimen was the extended infusion. Both regimens had comparable clinical and microbiological outcomes.