Author:
Alyan Emad,Arnau Stefan,Reiser Julian Elias,Getzmann Stephan,Karthaus Melanie,Wascher Edmund
Abstract
AbstractAssessing drivers’ cognitive load is crucial for driving safety in challenging situations. This research employed the occurrence of drivers’ natural eye blinks as cues in continuously recorded EEG data to assess the cognitive workload while reactive or proactive driving. Twenty-eight participants performed either a lane-keeping task with varying levels of crosswind (reactive) or curve road (proactive). The blink event-related potentials (bERPs) and spectral perturbations (bERSPs) were analyzed to assess cognitive load variations. The study found that task load during reactive driving did not significantly impact bERPs or bERSPs, possibly due to enduring alertness for vehicle control. The proactive driving revealed significant differences in the occipital N1 component with task load, indicating the necessity to adapt the attentional resources allocation based on road demands. Also, increased steering complexity led to decreased frontal N2, parietal P3, occipital P2 amplitudes, and alpha power, requiring more cognitive resources for processing relevant information. Interestingly, the proactive and reactive driving scenarios demonstrated a significant interaction at the parietal P2 and occipital N1 for three difficulty levels. The study reveals that EEG measures related to natural eye blink behavior provide insights into the effect of cognitive load on different driving tasks, with implications for driver safety.
Funder
Leibniz-Institut für Arbeitsforschung (IfADo)
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference49 articles.
1. World Health Organization. Road traffic injuries. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/road-traffic-injuries (2022)
2. Petridou, E. & Moustaki, M. Human factors in the causation of road traffic crashes. Eur. J. Epidemiol. 16, 819–826 (2000).
3. Singh, S. Critical Reasons for Crashes Investigated in the National Motor Vehicle Crash Causation Survey (2015).
4. Kelly, E., Darke, S. & Ross, J. A review of drug use and driving: Epidemiology, impairment, risk factors and risk perceptions. Drug Alcohol Rev. 23, 319–344 (2004).
5. Baldwin, C. L. et al. Detecting and quantifying mind wandering during simulated driving. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 11, 406 (2017).
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献