The effectiveness of split tablet dosing versus alternate-day dosing of warfarin: a randomized control trial

Author:

Kaewsaengeak Chanyapat,Pienputtarapong Usanee,Tocharoenchok Teerapong

Abstract

AbstractDue to large dosage variation, a variety of warfarin prescription regimens are utilized for specific doses such as tablet splitting, or pill strength alternating. The clinical comparison between the two is lacking. We hypothesize that both approaches result in different times in therapeutic range. We randomized patients with specific warfarin dosage and stable INR for 6 months or longer to receive the whole tablet, alternate-day dosing or the split tablet, same daily-dosing regimen without initial dose change and followed them every 6 weeks for 6 months. The primary outcome was a time in therapeutic range of 2.0–3.0. The secondary outcomes included dosage, compliance, INR, anticoagulant-related events. A total of 66 patients were enrolled, 32 randomly assigned to the split tablet regimen (group S) and 34 to the alternate-day regimen (group A) with two withdrawers. The mean age was 58.6 ± 8.5 years. All baseline characteristics of both groups were similar. The average time in therapeutic range was 72.8 ± 25.4% in group S and 74.9 ± 22.0% in group A (p = 0.72). There were no significant differences in warfarin dosage, compliance, INR and, complications between the two groups. Both warfarin prescription methods, the split tablet and the alternate-day had comparable time in the therapeutic range.

Funder

This study is supported by the Siriraj Research Development Fund (managed by Routine to Research).

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Multidisciplinary

Reference15 articles.

1. Wigle, P., Hein, B. & Bernheisel, C. R. Anticoagulation: Updated Guidelines for Outpatient Management. Am Fam Physician 100, 426–434 (2019).

2. Jaffer, A. & Bragg, L. Practical tips for warfarin dosing and monitoring. Cleve Clin J Med 70, 361–371. https://doi.org/10.3949/ccjm.70.4.361 (2003).

3. Chou, C.-L. et al. Tablet splitting of narrow therapeutic index drugs: a nationwide survey in Taiwan. Int. J. Clin. Pharm. 37, 1235–1241 (2015).

4. Helmy, S. A. Tablet splitting: is it worthwhile? Analysis of drug content and weight uniformity for half tablets of 16 commonly used medications in the outpatient setting. J. Manag. Care Spec. Pharm. 21, 76–88 (2015).

5. Rosendaal, F. R., Cannegieter, S. C., van der Meer, F. J. & Briet, E. A method to determine the optimal intensity of oral anticoagulant therapy. Thromb. Haemost. 69, 236–239 (1993).

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3