Abstract
Abstract
The Chinese government attaches great importance to the ecological restoration of abandoned open-pit mines, increasing the area of cultivated land, and ensuring food security. Soil reconstruction is a crucial step in ecological restoration of abandoned open-pit mines. This study investigated the utilization of hydrophobic sand to create an Air-Permeable Aquiclude (APAC) under the plant root zones, thereby minimizing water infiltration and enhancing soil aeration. Field plot experiments for 2 years have been conducted, with control groups, Clay Aquitard (CAT), and Plastic Aquiclude (PAC), to evaluate the effects of APAC on rice yield, nitrogen utilization, and water efficiency. The findings revealed that utilizing APAC resulted in a significant rise in rice yield, ranging from 8.09 t/hm² to 9.27 t/hm², which were 7.67–27.16% higher than the control groups. Moreover, the APAC led to a remarkable reduction in irrigation water usage by 37.08%, alongside a substantial boost in Irrigation Water Productivity (IWP) efficiency by 28.64–71.12%. Notably, Nitrogen Partial Factor Productivity (NPFP) exhibited a substantial increase of 7.69–27.06%. These outcomes underscore the APAC’s positive role in water and nutrient conservation and enhanced yields.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference45 articles.
1. Gbedzi, D. D. et al. Impact of mining on land use land cover change and water quality in the Asutifi North District of Ghana, West Africa. Environ. Challenges. 6, 100441 (2022).
2. Yu, H., Zahidi, I. & Liang, D. Mine land reclamation, mine land reuse, and vegetation cover change: an intriguing case study in Dartford, the United Kingdom. Environ. Res. 225, 115613 (2023).
3. Yang, J., Xu, W., Yao, W. & Sun, Y. Land destroyed by mining in China: damage distribution, rehabilitation status and existing problems. Earth Sci. Front. 28 (4), 83–89 (2021).
4. Yang, J. et al. Distribution and existing problems of mining land for abandoned open-pit mines in China. Remote Sens. Nat. Resour. 1–6 (2023).
5. Khalid, S. et al. A comparison of technologies for remediation of heavy metal contaminated soils. J. Geochem. Explor. 182, 247–268 (2017).