Modeling protective action decision-making in earthquakes by using explainable machine learning and video data

Author:

Zhang Xiaojian,Zhao Xilei,Baldwin Dare,McBride Sara,Bellizzi Josephine,Cochran Elizabeth S.,Luco Nicholas,Wood Matthew,Cova Thomas J.

Abstract

AbstractEarthquakes pose substantial threats to communities worldwide. Understanding how people respond to the fast-changing environment during earthquakes is crucial for reducing risks and saving lives. This study aims to study people’s protective action decision-making in earthquakes by leveraging explainable machine learning and video data. Specifically, this study first collected real-world CCTV footage and video postings from social media platforms, and then identified and annotated changes in the environment and people’s behavioral responses during the M7.1 2018 Anchorage earthquake. By using the fully annotated video data, we applied XGBoost, a widely-used machine learning method, to model and forecast people’s protective actions (e.g., drop and cover, hold on, and evacuate) during the earthquake. Then, explainable machine learning techniques were used to reveal the complex, nonlinear relationships between different factors and people’s choices of protective actions. Modeling results confirm that social and environmental cues played critical roles in affecting the probability of different protective actions. Certain factors, such as the earthquake shaking intensity and number of people shown in the environment, displayed evident nonlinear relationships with the probability of choosing to evacuate. These findings can help emergency managers and policymakers design more effective protective action recommendations during earthquakes.

Funder

United States Geological Survey (USGS) supplement award to the National Science Foundation

USGS IPA, University of Oregon

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Reference59 articles.

1. Lindell, M. K. & Perry, R. W. The protective action decision model: Theoretical modifications and additional evidence. Risk Anal. Int. J. 32, 616–632 (2012).

2. Arlikatti, S., HuANg, S.-K., Yu, C.-H. & HuA, C. ‘Drop, cover and hold on’ or ‘triangle of life’ attributes of information sources influencing earthquake protective actions. Int. J. Saf. Secur. Eng 9, 213–224 (2019).

3. Eiser, J. R. et al. Risk interpretation and action: A conceptual framework for responses to natural hazards. Int. J. Disast. Risk Reduct. 1, 5–16 (2012).

4. Raphael, B. Individual and Community Responses to Trauma and Disaster: The Structure of Human Chaos (Cambridge University Press, 1995).

5. Lovreglio, R., Fonzone, A. & Dell’Olio, L. A mixed logit model for predicting exit choice during building evacuations. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 92, 59–75 (2016).

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3