Author:
Zhang Xiaojian,Zhao Xilei,Baldwin Dare,McBride Sara,Bellizzi Josephine,Cochran Elizabeth S.,Luco Nicholas,Wood Matthew,Cova Thomas J.
Abstract
AbstractEarthquakes pose substantial threats to communities worldwide. Understanding how people respond to the fast-changing environment during earthquakes is crucial for reducing risks and saving lives. This study aims to study people’s protective action decision-making in earthquakes by leveraging explainable machine learning and video data. Specifically, this study first collected real-world CCTV footage and video postings from social media platforms, and then identified and annotated changes in the environment and people’s behavioral responses during the M7.1 2018 Anchorage earthquake. By using the fully annotated video data, we applied XGBoost, a widely-used machine learning method, to model and forecast people’s protective actions (e.g., drop and cover, hold on, and evacuate) during the earthquake. Then, explainable machine learning techniques were used to reveal the complex, nonlinear relationships between different factors and people’s choices of protective actions. Modeling results confirm that social and environmental cues played critical roles in affecting the probability of different protective actions. Certain factors, such as the earthquake shaking intensity and number of people shown in the environment, displayed evident nonlinear relationships with the probability of choosing to evacuate. These findings can help emergency managers and policymakers design more effective protective action recommendations during earthquakes.
Funder
United States Geological Survey (USGS) supplement award to the National Science Foundation
USGS IPA, University of Oregon
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference59 articles.
1. Lindell, M. K. & Perry, R. W. The protective action decision model: Theoretical modifications and additional evidence. Risk Anal. Int. J. 32, 616–632 (2012).
2. Arlikatti, S., HuANg, S.-K., Yu, C.-H. & HuA, C. ‘Drop, cover and hold on’ or ‘triangle of life’ attributes of information sources influencing earthquake protective actions. Int. J. Saf. Secur. Eng 9, 213–224 (2019).
3. Eiser, J. R. et al. Risk interpretation and action: A conceptual framework for responses to natural hazards. Int. J. Disast. Risk Reduct. 1, 5–16 (2012).
4. Raphael, B. Individual and Community Responses to Trauma and Disaster: The Structure of Human Chaos (Cambridge University Press, 1995).
5. Lovreglio, R., Fonzone, A. & Dell’Olio, L. A mixed logit model for predicting exit choice during building evacuations. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 92, 59–75 (2016).
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献