Electrical impedance tomography provides information of brain injury during total aortic arch replacement through its correlation with relative difference of neurological biomarkers
-
Published:2024-06-20
Issue:1
Volume:14
Page:
-
ISSN:2045-2322
-
Container-title:Scientific Reports
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Sci Rep
Author:
Guo Yitong,Yang Chen,Zhu Wenjing,Zhao Rong,Ren Kai,Duan Weixun,Liu Jincheng,Ma Jing,Chen Xiuming,Liu Benyuan,Xu Canhua,Jin Zhenxiao,Shi Xuetao
Abstract
AbstractPostoperative neurological dysfunction (PND) is one of the most common complications after a total aortic arch replacement (TAAR). Electrical impedance tomography (EIT) monitoring of cerebral hypoxia injury during TAAR is a promising technique for preventing the occurrence of PND. This study aimed to explore the feasibility of electrical impedance tomography (EIT) for warning of potential brain injury during total aortic arch replacement (TAAR) through building the correlation between EIT extracted parameters and variation of neurological biomarkers in serum. Patients with Stanford type A aortic dissection and requiring TAAR who were admitted between December 2021 to March 2022 were included. A 16-electrode EIT system was adopted to monitor each patient’s cerebral impedance intraoperatively. Five parameters of EIT signals regarding to the hypothermic circulatory arrest (HCA) period were extracted. Meanwhile, concentration of four neurological biomarkers in serum were measured regarding to time before and right after surgery, 12 h, 24 h and 48 h after surgery. The correlation between EIT parameters and variation of serum biomarkers were analyzed. A total of 57 TAAR patients were recruited. The correlation between EIT parameters and variation of biomarkers were stronger for patients with postoperative neurological dysfunction (PND(+)) than those without postoperative neurological dysfunction (PND(−)) in general. Particularly, variation of S100B after surgery had significantly moderate correlation with two parameters regarding to the difference of impedance between left and right brain which were MRAIabs and TRAIabs (0.500 and 0.485 with p < 0.05, respectively). In addition, significantly strong correlations were seen between variation of S100B at 24 h and the difference of average resistivity value before and after HCA phase (ΔARVHCA), the slope of electrical impedance during HCA (kHCA) and MRAIabs (0.758, 0.758 and 0.743 with p < 0.05, respectively) for patients with abnormal S100B level before surgery. Strong correlations were seen between variation of TAU after surgery and ΔARVHCA, kHCA and the time integral of electrical impedance for half flow of perfusion (TARVHP) (0.770, 0.794 and 0.818 with p < 0.01, respectively) for patients with abnormal TAU level before surgery. Another two significantly moderate correlations were found between TRAIabs and variation of GFAP at 12 h and 24 h (0.521 and 0.521 with p < 0.05, respectively) for patients with a normal GFAP serum level before surgery. The correlations between EIT parameters and serum level of neurological biomarkers were significant in patients with PND, especially for MRAIabs and TRAIabs, indicating that EIT may become a powerful assistant for providing a real-time warning of brain injury during TAAR from physiological perspective and useful guidance for intensive care units.
Funder
Innovation Foundation for Doctor Dissertation of Northwestern Polytechnical University
National Natural Science Foundation of China -General Program
Cross-integration project of Xijing Hospital
Key Research and Development Projects of the Science and Technology Committee
Key Basic Research Projects of the Basic Strengthening Plan of the Science and Technology Committee
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference47 articles.
1. Biancari, F. et al. Current outcome after surgery for type A aortic dissection. Ann. Surg 278, e885 (2023).
2. Gilbey, T. et al. Neurologic complications after cardiopulmonary bypass—A narrative review. Perfusion 38, 1545 (2023).
3. Liu, H. et al. Predictors of adverse outcome and transient neurological dysfunction following aortic arch replacement in 626 consecutive patients in China. Heart Lung Circ. 26(2), 172–178 (2017).
4. Fedorow, C. & Grocott, H. P. Cerebral monitoring to optimize outcomes after cardiac surgery. Curr. Opin. Anaesthesiol. 23(1), 89–94 (2010).
5. Milne, B. et al. Neuromonitoring and neurocognitive outcomes in cardiac surgery: A narrative review. J. Cardiothorac. Vasc. Anesth. 36(7), 2098–2113 (2022).