Author:
Sousa Loyriane Moura,Correia Letícia Lima,Alexandre Rafaela Jemely Rodrigues,Pena Simone Almeida,Vieira Thiago Bernardi
Abstract
AbstractThe creation of protected areas (PAs) is not always based on science; consequently, some aquatic species may not receive the same level of protection as terrestrial ones. The objective of this study was to identify priority areas for the conservation of chelonians in the Brazilian Amazon basin and assess the contribution of PAs, distinguishing between Full Protection Areas, Sustainable Use Areas, and Indigenous Lands for group protection. The entire species modeling procedure was carried out using Species Distribution Models. Location records were obtained from platforms such as SpeciesLink, GBIF, the Hydroatlas database, and WorldClim for bioclimatic variables adjusted with algorithms like Maximum Entropy, Random Forest, Support Vector Machine, and Gaussian-Bayesian. Indigenous lands cover more than 50% of the distribution areas of chelonian species in the Brazilian Amazon. Protected areas with higher conservation importance (Full Protection Areas and Sustainable Use Areas) hold less than 15% of the combined species distribution. Researchers face significant challenges when making decisions with models, especially in conservation efforts involving diverse taxa that differ significantly from one another within a group of individuals.
Funder
National Council for Scientific and Technological Development – CNPQ.
Amazon Foundation to Support Studies and Research – FAPESPA.
Foundation Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel – CAPES.
Centro Nacional de Pesquisa e Conservação de Cavernas
Instituto Brasileiro de Desenvolvimento e Sustentabilidade – IABS
VALE S.A.
Sociedade Brasileira de Quirópteros - SBEQ
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference84 articles.
1. Liu, J., Slik, F., Zheng, S. & Lindenmayer, D. B. Undescribed species have higher extinction risk than known species. Conserv. Lett. 15, 1–8 (2022).
2. Adebayo, O. Loss of biodiversity: The burgeoning threat to human health. Ann. Ibadan Postgrad. Med. 17, 1–3 (2019).
3. Prakash, S. & Verma, A. K. Anthropogenic activities and biodiversity threats. Int. J. Biol. Innov. 04, 94–103 (2022).
4. Su, G. et al. Human impacts on global freshwater fish biodiversity. Science 371, 835–838 (2021).
5. Ferrante, L. & Fearnside, P. M. Brazil’s new president and ‘ruralists’ threaten Amazonia’s environment, traditional peoples and the global climate. Environ. Conserv. 46, 261–263 (2019).
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献