Author:
Muller Antoine,Shipton Ceri,Clarkson Chris
Abstract
AbstractStone tools are a manifestation of the complex cognitive and dexterous skills of our hominin ancestors. As such, much research has been devoted to understanding the skill requirements of individual lithic technologies. Yet, comparing skill across different technologies, and thus across the vast timespan of the Palaeolithic, is an elusive goal. We seek to quantify a series of commensurable metrics of knapping skill across four different lithic technologies (discoids, handaxes, Levallois, and prismatic blades). To compare the requisite dexterity, coordination, and care involved in each technology, we analysed video footage and lithic material from a series of replicative knapping experiments to quantify deliberation (strike time), precision (platform area), intricacy (flake size relative to core size), and success (relative blank length). According to these four metrics, discoidal knapping appears to be easiest among the sample. Levallois knapping involved an intricate reduction sequence, but did not require as much motor control as handaxes and especially prismatic blades. Compared with the other Palaeolithic technologies, we conclude that prismatic blade knapping is set apart by being a skill intensive means of producing numerous standardised elongate end-products.
Funder
Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference111 articles.
1. Muller, A. & Clarkson, C. Identifying major transitions in the evolution of lithic cutting edge production rates. PLoS One 11, e0167244 (2016).
2. Muller, A., Clarkson, C. & Shipton, C. Measuring behavioural and cognitive complexity in lithic technology throughout human evolution. J. Anthropol. Archaeol. 48, 166–180 (2017).
3. Mellars, P. Major issues in the emergence of modern humans. Curr. Anthropol. 30, 349–385 (1989).
4. Mellars, P. Technological changes across the Middle-Upper Palaeolithic transition: Economic, social and cognitive perspectives. In The Human Revolution: Behavioural and Biological Perspectives on the Origins of Modern Humans (eds Mellars, P. & Stringer, C.) 338–365 (Edinburgh University Press, 1989).
5. Foley, R. Hominid species and stone-tool assemblages: How are they related?. Antiquity 61, 380–392 (1987).
Cited by
21 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献