The accuracy and safety of intraoperative ultrasound-guided external ventricular drainage in intraventricular hemorrhage

Abstract

AbstractSevere IVH often results in a poor outcome. Currently, EVD is a standard treatment for IVH, but there is little research to show whether using ultrasound to guide the catheter placement improves outcome. Patients with severe IVH who had iUS-guided EVD (the iUS-guided group) were enrolled retrospectively and compared with a group who had EVD performed without ultrasound guidance (the control group) from January 2016 to July 2022. Data were collected on accuracy of the catheter placement, complications and outcome at 3 months assessed by mRS. The accuracy of the EVD placement was classified as optimal placement, sub-optimal placement and misplacement according to the position of the catheter tip. The complications reported are catheter-related hemorrhage, intracranial infection and hydrocephalus. There were 105 cases enrolled, with 72 patients in the iUS-guided group having 131 catheters inserted and 33 patients in the group where ultrasound was not used with a total of 59 catheters. 116 (88.55%) were optimally placed, 12 (9.16%) sub-optimal and 3 (2.29%) misplaced in the iUS-guided group, while 25 (42.37%) were in optimally placed, 30 (50.85%) sub-optimal and 4(6.78%) misplaced in the control group. Accuracy of placement was highly significantly improved using ultrasound (P < 0.001). The operation time and the average catheterized time were longer in the iUS-guided group (P < 0.05), but the complication rates were no different between the groups. The mRS at three months was not significantly different between the two groups. Using iUS to place EVD catheters in patients with severe IVH is a safe technique delivering more accurate catheter placement without increasing the complication rate compared with freehand placement.