Author:
Kosel Janez,Ropret Polonca
Abstract
AbstractArchaeological pottery are the most numerous objects found during excavations and reflect the culinary practices of the past. However, their functionality for cooking/storing specific foods or drinks cannot be deduced solely from comparing their shapes and sizes. Analysis of protein residues bound to ceramics can reveal the protein/animal type through their amino acid sequence, thus enabling direct identification of food types. Therefore, the aim of our experimental study was to test sixteen aptamers for the analysis of proteinaceous organic residues found within the porous structure of pottery. Traditionally prepared archaeological ceramic replicas were cooked for 5 days in various food/protein suspensions, were UV aged, buried for a year, excavated, and extensively cleaned. Their shards were analysed using immunofluorescence microscopy with aptamers. Results show that eight aptamers (Clone1 and Kirby for egg residuals; seqU5 and BLG14 for milk residuals; HA for blood residuals; Gli4 for gluten residuals; Par1 for fish residuals; and D1 for collagen residuals) produced a successful/specific immunofluorescence microscopy result when they were hybridised to shards containing target protein residuals. Interestingly, on whole egg control samples, when the egg lysozyme-targeting aptamer Kirby was used, fluorescence intensity was 3.1 times greater compared to that observed with anti-ovalbumin antibodies.
Funder
Javna Agencija za Raziskovalno Dejavnost RS
E-RIHS.SI
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference60 articles.
1. Craig, O. E. et al. Earliest evidence for the use of pottery. Nat. 2013 4967445 496, 351–354 (2013).
2. Shelach-Lavi, G. & Tu, D. Food, pots and socio-economic transformation: The beginning and intensification of pottery production in North China. Archaeol. Res. Asia 12, 1–10 (2017).
3. Childe, V. G. Directional changes in funerary practices during 50,000 years. Man 45, 13 (1945).
4. Hendy, J. Ancient protein analysis in archaeology. Sci. Adv. 7, 9314–9329 (2021).
5. Twiss, K. The archaeology of food and social diversity. J. Archaeol. Res. 20, 357–395 (2012).