Sex differences in social brain neural responses in autism: temporal profiles of configural face-processing within data-driven time windows
-
Published:2024-06-18
Issue:1
Volume:14
Page:
-
ISSN:2045-2322
-
Container-title:Scientific Reports
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Sci Rep
Author:
Del Bianco TeresaORCID, Lai Meng-ChuanORCID, Mason Luke, Johnson Mark H., Charman TonyORCID, Loth Eva, Banaschewski TobiasORCID, Buitelaar JanORCID, Murphy Declan G. M.ORCID, Jones Emily J. H.ORCID, , Baron-Cohen Simon, Durston Sarah, Persico Antonio, Bölte Sven, Caceres Antonia San Jose, Hayward Hannah, Crawley Daisy, Faulkner Jessica, Sabet Jessica, Ellis Claire, Oakley Bethany, Holt Rosemary, Ambrosino Sara, Bast Nico, Baumeister Sarah, Rausch Annika, Bours Carsten, Cornelissen Ineke, von Rhein Daniel, O’Dwyer Laurence, Tillmann Julian, Ahmad Jumana, Simonoff Emily, Hipp Joerg, Garces Pilar, Ecker Christine, Meyer-Lindenberg Andreas, Tost Heike, Moessnang Carolin, Brandeis Daniel, Beckmann Christian, Acqua Flavio Dell’, Ruigrok Amber, Bourgeron Thomas
Abstract
AbstractFace-processing timing differences may underlie visual social attention differences between autistic and non-autistic people, and males and females. This study investigates the timing of the effects of neurotype and sex on face-processing, and their dependence on age. We analysed EEG data during upright and inverted photographs of faces from 492 participants from the Longitudinal European Autism Project (141 neurotypical males, 76 neurotypical females, 202 autistic males, 73 autistic females; age 6–30 years). We detected timings of sex/diagnosis effects on event-related potential amplitudes at the posterior–temporal channel P8 with Bootstrapped Cluster-based Permutation Analysis and conducted Growth Curve Analysis (GCA) to investigate the timecourse and dependence on age of neural signals. The periods of influence of neurotype and sex overlapped but differed in onset (respectively, 260 and 310 ms post-stimulus), with sex effects lasting longer. GCA revealed a smaller and later amplitude peak in autistic female children compared to non-autistic female children; this difference decreased in adolescence and was not significant in adulthood. No age-dependent neurotype difference was significant in males. These findings indicate that sex and neurotype influence longer latency face processing and implicates cognitive rather than perceptual processing. Sex may have more overarching effects than neurotype on configural face processing.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference76 articles.
1. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders 5th edn. (American Psychiatric Association, 2013). 2. Zeidan, J. et al. Global prevalence of autism: A systematic review update. Autism Res. 15, 778–790. https://doi.org/10.1002/aur.2696 (2022). 3. Maenner, M. J. et al. Prevalence of autism spectrum disorder among children aged 8 years-autism and developmental disabilities monitoring network, 11 sites, United States, 2016. MMWR Surveill. Summ. 69, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.15585/MMWR.SS6904A1 (2020). 4. Klin, A., Jones, W., Schultz, R., Volkmar, F. & Cohen, D. Visual fixation patterns during viewing of naturalistic social situations as predictors of social competence in individuals with autism. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 59, 809–816. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.59.9.809 (2002). 5. Chita-Tegmark, M. Social attention in ASD: A review and meta-analysis of eye-tracking studies. Res. Dev. Disabil. 48, 79–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2015.10.011 (2016).
|
|