Author:
AL-Omiri Mahmoud K.,Atieh Danial Waleed Ahmad,Al Nazeh Abdullah A.,Almoammar Salem,Bin Hassan Saeed Awod,Alshadidi Abdulkhaliq Ali F.,Aldosari Lujain Ibrahim N.,Aljehani Ahmad,Shat Naji M.,Lynch Edward
Abstract
AbstractThis analytical cross-sectional study evaluated the perception of black triangles (BT) and examined the relationships between the perception of BT, personality factors, different educational backgrounds and demographic factors. 435 participants were included and divided into four groups: dentists, clinical (4th and 5th year) dental students, pre-clinical (3rd year) dental students, and laypeople. Participants’ perception of the attractiveness of smile profiles of maxillary and mandibular anterior dentition with BT was rated using a ten-point VAS scale with 0 being the least, and 10 being the most attractive smile profile. The personality was assessed using the NEO-FFI personality questionnaire. The smile profile with multiple large BT was rated the least attractive for the maxillary (mean = 3.6) and mandibular (mean = 3.9) tested profiles. The smile profile without BT was rated the most attractive for the maxillary (mean = 9.1) and mandibular (mean = 8.8) tested profiles. The dental professionals perceived the maxillary smile profile with multiple large BT as less attractive than the non-dental participants (t = − 2.715, P = 0.007). Being a male, having dental education, having lower Neuroticism scores, as well as having higher Openness, Agreeableness, Conscientiousness, and Extraversion scores predicted and contributed more towards perceiving various tested smile profiles as more attractive. These findings show that black triangles negatively impacts the perception of smile attractiveness, and that personality traits and having dental education impact the perception of smile attractiveness for smiles with black triangles.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference65 articles.
1. McLaren, E. A. & Rifkin, R. Macroesthetics: Facial and dentofacial analysis. J. Calif. Dent. Assoc. 30(11), 839–846 (2002).
2. Gonzalez, M. K. et al. Interdental papillary house: A new concept and guide for clinicians. Int. J. Periodont. Restor. Dent. 31(6), e87-93 (2011).
3. Sharma, P. & Sharma, P. Dental smile esthetics: The assessment and creation of the ideal smile. Semin. Orthod. 18, 193–201. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.sodo.2012.04.004 (2012).
4. Sriphadungporn, C. & Chamnannidiadha, N. Perception of smile esthetics by laypeople of different ages. Prog. Orthod. 18(1), 8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40510-017-0162-4 (2017).
5. Batra, P., Daing, A., Azam, I., Miglani, R. & Bhardwaj, A. Impact of altered gingival characteristics on smile esthetics: Laypersons’ perspectives by Q sort methodology. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial Orthop. 154(1), 82-90.e82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2017.12.010 (2018).
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献