Abstract
AbstractFor rewilding the depleted crocodylian populations in India, a targeted ‘one-species one area’ based conservation approach was adopted in the early-1970s. Suitable habitats were identified and designated as protected areas, specifically targeted to recover a particular crocodylian species. A ~ 610 km stretch of Chambal River in the Ganga River Basin was declared as National Chambal Sanctuary to restore the ‘Critically Endangered’ gharial (Gavialis gangeticus), where active management of mugger (Crocodylus palustris) was discouraged. In the present study, we examined the population trends, occupancy, and genetic status of mugger by conducting population monitoring and genetic assessment to understand the status of potentially competitive mugger in the Sanctuary. Our finding suggests that the mugger population has notably increased and colonised the Sanctuary. We observed a moderate level of genetic diversity in the mugger, which was relatively higher compared to the gharial in the Sanctuary. The rapid colonization of ecological generalist mugger raises concerns about potential competition with ecological specialist gharial threatening its long-term sustainability. Considering the coexistence dynamics between the species, it is essential to extend adaptive management strategies for mugger to ensure successful recovery of gharial population in the Sanctuary.
Funder
Grant-in-aid funds of the Wildlife Institute of India
National Mission for Clean Ganga (NMCG), Ministry of Jal Shakti, Government of India
Department of Science and Technology-INSPIRE
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference89 articles.
1. Ceballos, G., Ehrlich, P. R. & Raven, P. H. Vertebrates on the brink as indicators of biological annihilation and the sixth mass extinction. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 117(24), 13596–13602. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1922686117 (2020).
2. Díaz, S., Fargione, J., Stuart Chapin, F. & Tilman, D. Biodiversity loss threatens human well-being. PLoS Biol. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0040277 (2006).
3. Spielman, D., Brook, B. W. & Frankham, R. Most species are not driven to extinction before genetic factors impact them. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 101, 15261–15264 (2004).
4. Dodd, K. C. & Seigel, R. A. Relocation, repatriation, and translocation of amphibians and reptiles: Are they conservation strategies that work?. Herpetologica 47(3), 336–350. https://doi.org/10.1016/0006-3207(92)91063-x (1991).
5. IUCN/SSC. Guidelines for Reintroductions and Other Conservation Translocations IUCN. Version 1.0. Gland, viiii + 57, (IUCN Species Survival Commission, 2013).