Abstract
AbstractCarbon prices in the EU emissions trading system are a key instrument driving Europe’s decarbonization. Between 2017 and 2021, they surged tenfold, exceeding €80 tCO2−1 and reshaping investment decisions across the electricity and industry sectors. What has driven this increase is an open question. While it coincided with two significant reforms tightening the cap (‘MSR reform’ and ‘Fit for 55’), we argue that a reduced supply of allowances alone cannot fully explain the price rise. A further crucial aspect is that actors must have become more farsighted as the reform signalled policymakers’ credible long-term commitment to climate targets. This is consistent with model results that show historic prices can be better explained with myopic actors, whereas explaining prices after the reforms requires actors to be farsighted. To underline the role of credibility, we test what would happen if a crisis undermines policy credibility such that actors become myopic again, demonstrating that carbon prices could plummet and endanger the energy transition.
Funder
European Commission
German Federal Ministry of Education and Research
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference76 articles.
1. EU Emissions Trading System (EU ETS) (European Commission, 2021); https://ec.europa.eu/clima/eu-action/eu-emissions-trading-system-eu-ets_en
2. ICAP Allowance Price Explorer (ICAP, 2022); https://icapcarbonaction.com/en/ets-prices
3. Gerlagh, R., Heijmans, R. J. R. K. & Rosendahl, K. E. Shifting concerns for the EU ETS: are carbon prices becoming too high? Environ. Res. Lett. 17, 054018 (2022).
4. Willner, M. Consulting the chrystal ball: firms’ foresight and a cap-and-trade scheme with endogenous supply adjustments. Preprint at SSRN https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3231927 (2018).
5. Perino, G. et al. EU ETS Stability Mechanism Needs New Design. (CEC Dauphine Policy Brief, 2021).