The traditional Chinese medicine Qiliqiangxin in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial
-
Published:2024-08
Issue:8
Volume:30
Page:2295-2302
-
ISSN:1078-8956
-
Container-title:Nature Medicine
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Nat Med
Author:
Cheang Iokfai, Yao Wenming, Zhou Yanli, Zhu XuORCID, Ni Gehui, Lu Xinyi, Liao Shengen, Gao Rongrong, Zhou Fang, Shen Jiangang, Leung Alice Yeuk Lan, Jiang Meng, Kong Hong, Bai Ling, Mahemuti Ailiman, Yuan Haitao, Dong Yu-Gang, Wong Chun-Ka, Xu Qinghua, Zhang Gaoxing, Wu Jianhua, Lu Qi, Zhang Junhai, Cha Chunxi, Ren Qian, Fu Lu, Wang Bing, Xu Yongshun, Hu Houxiang, Dong Jing, Shang Zhuo, Yu Chaoping, Li Songsen, Yao Chen, Gao Lingling, Zhang Haifeng, Rosenzweig AnthonyORCID, Jia ZhenhuaORCID, Li XinliORCID,
Abstract
AbstractPrevious findings have indicated the potential benefits of the Chinese traditional medicine Qiliqiangxin (QLQX) in heart failure. Here we performed a double-blind, randomized controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of QLQX in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). This multicenter trial, conducted in 133 hospitals in China, enrolled 3,110 patients with HFrEF with NT-proBNP levels of ≥450 pg ml−1 and left ventricular ejection fraction of ≤40%. Participants were randomized to receive either QLQX capsules or placebo (four capsules three times daily) alongside standard heart failure therapy. The trial met its primary outcome, which was a composite of hospitalization for heart failure and cardiovascular death: over a median follow-up of 18.3 months, the primary outcome occurred in 389 patients (25.02%) in the QLQX group and 467 patients (30.03%) in the placebo group (hazard ratio (HR), 0.78; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.68−0.90; P < 0.001). In an analysis of secondary outcomes, the QLQX group showed reductions in both hospitalization for heart failure (15.63% versus 19.16%; HR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.64−0.90; P = 0.002) and cardiovascular death (13.31% versus 15.95%; HR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.68−0.996; P = 0.045) compared to the placebo group. All-cause mortality did not differ significantly between the two groups (HR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.70−1.01; P = 0.058) and adverse events were also comparable between the groups. The results of this trial indicate that QLQX may improve clinical outcomes in patients with HFrEF when added to conventional therapy. ChiCTR registration: ChiCTR1900021929.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference33 articles.
1. Hao, G. et al. Prevalence of heart failure and left ventricular dysfunction in China: the China Hypertension Survey, 2012-2015. Eur. J. Heart Fail. 21, 1329–1337 (2019). 2. Wang, H. et al. Prevalence and incidence of heart failure among urban patients in China: a national population-based analysis. Circ. Heart Fail. 14, e008406 (2021). 3. DeVore, A. D. et al. Effect of a hospital and postdischarge quality improvement intervention on clinical outcomes and quality of care for patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: the CONNECT-HF randomized clinical trial. JAMA 326, 314–323 (2021). 4. Shah, K. S. et al. Heart failure with preserved, borderline, and reduced ejection fraction: 5-year outcomes. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 70, 2476–2486 (2017). 5. Hao, P. et al. Traditional Chinese medicine for cardiovascular disease: evidence and potential mechanisms. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 69, 2952–2966 (2017).
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|