Severity in the genomic age: the significance of lived experience to understandings of severity

Author:

Kaur AmarpreetORCID

Abstract

AbstractThis article explores the significance of lived experience to understandings of severity in the genomic age. It draws upon data from structured interviews with 21 people living with monogenic conditions in England. The article argues that while lived experiences are subjective, participants consider the severity of disease by the impact a condition has on a person’s quality of life and mental health; both of these interplays are influenced by social, economic, and environmental factors. The three factors and considerations to the impact of living with disease on mental health are generally absent from current frameworks designed to assess severity for clinical applications of genomic technologies such as preimplantation genetic testing (PGT). This article describes ways in which such factors impact the quality of life and the mental health of people living with genetic conditions. It also indicates what lived experiences, which illustrate the impact of these factors, have to offer policy-makers when they are assessing the concept of severity or seriousness of genetic conditions for applications of existing and potential genomic technologies in the genomic age.

Funder

RCUK | Economic and Social Research Council

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Reference35 articles.

1. Shendure J, Findlay GM, Snyder MW. Genomic medicine–progress, pitfalls, and promise. Cell. 2019;177:45–57.

2. Salit M, Woodcock J. MAQC and the era of genomic medicine. Nat Biotechnol. 2021;39:1066–7.

3. International Commission on the Clinical Use of Human Germline Genome Editing, The Royal Society, National Academy of Medicine, National Academy of Sciences. In: Heritable Human Genome Editing. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2020. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK561519/.

4. Wertz DC, Knoppers BM. Serious genetic disorders: can or should they be defined? Am J Med Genet. 2002;108:29–35.

5. Kleiderman E, Ravitsky V, Knoppers BM. The ‘Serious’ factor in germline modification. J Med Ethics. 2019;45:508–13.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3