Barriers and facilitators to utilizing digital health technologies by healthcare professionals

Author:

Borges do Nascimento Israel Júnior,Abdulazeem HebatullahORCID,Vasanthan Lenny ThinagaranORCID,Martinez Edson ZangiacomiORCID,Zucoloto Miriane Lucindo,Østengaard LasseORCID,Azzopardi-Muscat Natasha,Zapata TomasORCID,Novillo-Ortiz DavidORCID

Abstract

AbstractDigital technologies change the healthcare environment, with several studies suggesting barriers and facilitators to using digital interventions by healthcare professionals (HPs). We consolidated the evidence from existing systematic reviews mentioning barriers and facilitators for the use of digital health technologies by HP. Electronic searches were performed in five databases (Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Embase®, Epistemonikos, MEDLINE®, and Scopus) from inception to March 2023. We included reviews that reported barriers or facilitators factors to use technology solutions among HP. We performed data abstraction, methodological assessment, and certainty of the evidence appraisal by at least two authors. Overall, we included 108 reviews involving physicians, pharmacists, and nurses were included. High-quality evidence suggested that infrastructure and technical barriers (Relative Frequency Occurrence [RFO] 6.4% [95% CI 2.9–14.1]), psychological and personal issues (RFO 5.3% [95% CI 2.2–12.7]), and concerns of increasing working hours or workload (RFO 3.9% [95% CI 1.5–10.1]) were common concerns reported by HPs. Likewise, high-quality evidence supports that training/educational programs, multisector incentives, and the perception of technology effectiveness facilitate the adoption of digital technologies by HPs (RFO 3.8% [95% CI 1.8–7.9]). Our findings showed that infrastructure and technical issues, psychological barriers, and workload-related concerns are relevant barriers to comprehensively and holistically adopting digital health technologies by HPs. Conversely, deploying training, evaluating HP’s perception of usefulness and willingness to use, and multi-stakeholders incentives are vital enablers to enhance the HP adoption of digital interventions.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Health Information Management,Health Informatics,Computer Science Applications,Medicine (miscellaneous)

Reference161 articles.

1. Beer, P. & Mulder, R. H. The effects of technological developments on work and their implications for continuous vocational education and training: a systematic review. Front. Psychol. 11, 918 (2020).

2. Bronsoler, A., Doyle, J. & Van Reenen J. The Impact of New Technology on the Healthcare Workforce. 60. Available at https://workofthefuture.mit.edu/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/2020-Research-Brief-Bronsoler-Doyle-VanReenen.pdf.

3. Borges do Nascimento, I. J. et al. The global effect of digital health technologies on health workers’ competencies and health workplace: an umbrella review of systematic reviews and lexical-based and sentence-based meta-analysis. Lancet Digit Health 5, e534–e544 (2023).

4. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Electronic Health Records Survey public use file national weighted estimates—NEHRS Survey Results and Products (2019). https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nehrs/2019NEHRS-PUF-weighted-estimates-508.pdf.

5. Fischer, S. H., Ray, K. N., Mehrotra, A., Bloom, E. L. & Uscher-Pines, L. Prevalence and Characteristics of Telehealth Utilization in the United States. JAMA Netw. Open 3, e2022302 (2020).

Cited by 68 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3