College Selectivity, Choice of Major, and Post-College Earnings

Author:

Muse William Brian,Muse Iryna

Abstract

<p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:Times New Roman,Times,serif"><span style="font-size:16px"><span dir="ltr" lang="EN-US"><span style="color:black">College choice and choice of major are the most important decisions for future earnings. It is still unclear, however, what makes a greater difference&mdash;college or major&mdash;or whether a choice of college matters more for some majors, but not the others. Using cross-classified models and College Scorecard data, I show that a discipline is more consequential for future earnings than a college. The effect of STEM is substantial but is less pronounced at institutions with higher overall median earnings. The effect of college selectivity on earnings is more pronounced for non-STEM disciplines. Institutional characteristics&mdash;such as tuition, shares of graduates receiving different forms of financial aid, institutional size and location, and type of college&mdash;correlate with earnings of graduates. Racial and gender composition of an educational program correlate with expected earnings of its graduates even after control for other institutional and disciplinary characteristics. Models presented here provide a better understanding of the effect of college and major choices on future earnings.</span></span></span></span></p>

Publisher

Anser Press Pte. Ltd.

Reference55 articles.

1. ACT (2018). ACT / SAT Concordance. Retrieved on May 26, 2022 at https://www.act.org/content/act/en/products-and-services/the-act/scores/act-sat-concordance.html

2. Becker, G. S. (1964). Human Capital. New York: Columbia University Press. www.nber.org/books/beck-5

3. Benoit, K. (2011). Linear Regression Models with Logarithmic Transformations. Methodology Institute, London School of Economics, 8p. Retrieved on March 10, 2022 at https://kenbenoit.net/assets/courses/ME104/logmodels2.pdf .

4. Bickel, R. (2007). Multilevel Analysis for Applied Research: It's Just Regression! New York: Guilford Press. https://doi.org/10.3138/cjpe.025.008

5. Black, D.A. and Smith, J.A. (2006). Estimating the Returns to College Quality with Multiple Proxies for Quality. Journal of Labor Economics, 24(3): 701-728. https://doi.org/10.1086/505067

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3