Vertebral Compression Fracture After Spine Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy: The Role of Vertebral Endplate Disruption

Author:

Dibs Khaled1,Facer Benjin1,Mageswaran Prasath2,Raval Raju1,Thomas Evan1,Gogineni Emile1ORCID,Beyer Sasha1,Pan Jeff3,Klamer Brett3,Ayan Ahmet1,Bourekas Eric4,Boulter Daniel4,Fetko Nicholas4,Cochran Eric1,Zoller Ian1,Chakravarthy Vikram5,Tili Esmerina6,Elder J. Bradley5,Lonser Russel5,Elguindy Ahmed1,Soghrati Soheil2,Marras William2,Grecula John1,Chakravarti Arnab1,Palmer Joshua1ORCID,Blakaj Dukagjin M.1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Radiation Oncology, The James Cancer Hospital at the Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA;

2. The Spine Research Institute, College of Engineering, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA;

3. Department of Biostatistics, The James Cancer Hospital at the Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA;

4. Department of Radiology, The James Cancer Hospital at the Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA;

5. Department of Neurosurgery, The James Cancer Hospital at the Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA;

6. Department of Anesthesiology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Vertebral compression fracture (VCF) is a common, but serious toxicity of spinal stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). Several variables that place patients at high risk of VCF have previously been identified, including advanced Spinal Instability Neoplastic Score (SINS), a widely adopted clinical decision criterion to assess spinal instability. We examine the role of tumoral endplate (EP) disruption in the risk of VCF and attempt to incorporate it into a simple risk stratification system. METHODS: This study was a retrospective cohort study from a single institution. Demographic and treatment information was collected for patients who received spinal SBRT between 2013 and 2019. EP disruption was noted on pre-SBRT computed tomography scan. The primary end point of 1-year cumulative incidence of VCF was assessed on follow-up MRI and computed tomography scans at 3-month intervals after treatment. RESULTS: A total of 111 patients were included. The median follow-up was 18 months. Approximately 48 patients (43%) had at least one EP disruption. Twenty patients (18%) experienced a VCF at a median of 5.2 months from SBRT. Patients with at least one EP disruption were more likely to experience VCF than those with no EP disruption (29% vs 6%, P < .001). A nomogram was created using the variables of EP disruption, a SINS of ≥7, and adverse histology. Patients were stratified into groups at low and high risk of VCF, which were associated with 2% and 38% risk of VCF (P < .001). CONCLUSION: EP disruption is a novel risk factor for VCF in patients who will undergo spinal SBRT. A simple nomogram incorporating EP disruption, adverse histology, and SINS score is effective for quickly assessing risk of VCF. These data require validation in prospective studies and could be helpful in counseling patients regarding VCF risk and referring for prophylactic interventions in high-risk populations.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Neurology (clinical),Surgery

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3