Biportal Endoscopic TransOrbital and transMaxillary Approach to the Cranio-Orbital Region and Middle Cranial Fossa: A Preliminary Analysis of Maneuverability

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Traditional and well-established transcranial approaches to the spheno-orbital region and middle cranial fossa guarantee optimal intracranial exposure, and additional orbital and zygomatic osteotomies provide further control over extracranial components to be resected; however, these techniques come at the cost of additional morbidity. The introduction of minimally invasive endoscopic approaches and the conceptualization of the so-called “multiportal” paradigm might provide an alternative route. This preliminary study investigates the feasibility of the combined Biportal Endoscopic TransOrbital and transMaxillary Approach (bETOMA) approach to the spheno-orbital and middle cranial fossa regions. METHODS: Using 4 silicon-injected adult cadaver heads (8 sides; 16 approaches), we systematically dissected through superior eyelid ETOA and endoscopic TMA approaches. The analysis focused on pterygopalatine, infratemporal, anterior and middle cranial fossae, Meckel cave, and cavernous sinus access. We evaluated the feasibility of bETOMA using linear distances, angles of attack, and exposure areas. We also introduced volume of operative maneuverability, its standardized derivative (sVOM), target distance, visuo-operative angle, and working zone volume as novel metrics. RESULTS: The analysis revealed comparable angles of attack between approaches. ETOA and TMA exposure areas were 918.38 ± 223.93 mm2 and 257.07 ± 86.07 mm2, respectively. TMA showed a larger VOM in the greater sphenoid wing, but ETOA offered superior distal maneuverability (sVOM: 5.39 ± 1.94 vs 2.54 ± 0.79 cm3) and closer intracranial space access (27.45 vs 50.83 mm). The combined approaches yielded a mean working zone volume of 13.75 ± 3.73 cm3 in the spheno-orbital interface. CONCLUSION: The bETOMA approach provides adequate neurovascular exposure and maneuverability to the spheno-orbital region, infratemporal, and anterior and middle cranial fossae, addressing significant limitations of previously investigated monoportal techniques (ie, optic nerve decompression, hyperostotic bone resection, and infratemporal exposure). This combined minimally invasive approach might help manage lesions harbored within the cranio-orbital interface region invading the extracranial space.