Access to and Satisfaction with Care Comparing Patients with and without Serious Mental Illness

Author:

Kilbourne Amy M.1,McCarthy John F.2,Post Edward P.3,Welsh Deborah4,Pincus Harold Alan5,Bauer Mark S.6,Blow Frederic C.2

Affiliation:

1. VA Pittsburgh Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion

2. VA National Serious Mental Illness Treatment Research and Evaluation Center and University of Michigan

3. University of Pittsburgh

4. VA National Serious Mental Illness Treatment Research and Evaluation Center

5. Columbia University

6. VA Providence Medical Center and Brown University

Abstract

Objectives: We compared perceived access to and satisfaction with health care between patients diagnosed with serious mental illness (SMI: schizophrenia or bipolar disorder) and among those with no SMI diagnosis. Method: We conducted a national, cross-sectional study of VA patients in Fiscal Year (FY) 1999 (N=7,187) who completed the VA's Large Health Survey of Veteran Enrollees (LHSV) section on access and satisfaction and either received a diagnosis of schizophrenia or bipolar disorder, or did not and were randomly selected from the general non-SMI VA patient population (non-SMI group). We compared the probability of perceived poor access and dissatisfaction using multivariable logistic regression adjusting for patient covariates. Results: Compared to non-SMI patients, patients diagnosed with bipolar disorder were more likely to report difficulty in receiving care they needed (adjusted OR =1.36, p < .05) or seeing a specialist (adjusted OR=1.44, p < .001). Patients diagnosed with schizophrenia were more likely to report dissatisfaction, including thoroughness by their provider (adjusted OR=1.37, p < .001) and the provider's explanation of problems (adjusted OR=1.54, p < .001) compared to non-SMI patients. Conclusions: Patients diagnosed with bipolar disorder reported greater problems with access to health care, while those diagnosed with schizophrenia were less satisfied with the process of care.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Psychiatry and Mental health

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3