Affiliation:
1. Dynamics Research Group, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of SheffieldMappin Street, Sheffield S1 3JD, UK
Abstract
In broad terms, there are two approaches to damage identification. Model-driven methods establish a high-fidelity physical model of the structure, usually by finite element analysis, and then establish a comparison metric between the model and the measured data from the real structure. If the model is for a system or structure in normal (i.e. undamaged) condition, any departures indicate that the structure has deviated from normal condition and damage is inferred. Data-driven approaches also establish a model, but this is usually a statistical representation of the system, e.g. a probability density function of the normal condition. Departures from normality are then signalled by measured data appearing in regions of very low density. The algorithms that have been developed over the years for data-driven approaches are mainly drawn from the discipline of pattern recognition, or more broadly, machine learning. The object of this paper is to illustrate the utility of the data-driven approach to damage identification by means of a number of case studies.
Subject
General Physics and Astronomy,General Engineering,General Mathematics
Reference30 articles.
1. Barnett L& Lewis T Outliers in statistical data. 3rd edn. 1994 Chichester UK:Wiley.
2. The Omnibus model: a new model of data fusion?
3. Bishop C.M Neural networks for pattern recognition. 1998 Oxford UK:Oxford University Press.
Cited by
300 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献