Multisensory causal inference is feature-specific, not object-based

Author:

Badde Stephanie1ORCID,Landy Michael S.2ORCID,Adams Wendy J.3ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Psychology, Tufts University, 490 Boston Avenue, Medford, MA 02155, USA

2. Department of Psychology and Center of Neural Science, New York University, 6 Washington Place, New York, NY 10003, USA

3. Department of Psychology, University of Southampton, 44 Highfield Campus, Southampton SO17 1BJ, UK

Abstract

Multisensory integration depends on causal inference about the sensory signals. We tested whether implicit causal-inference judgements pertain to entire objects or focus on task-relevant object features. Participants in our study judged virtual visual, haptic and visual–haptic surfaces with respect to two features—slant and roughness—against an internal standard in a two-alternative forced-choice task. Modelling of participants' responses revealed that the degree to which their perceptual judgements were based on integrated visual–haptic information varied unsystematically across features. For example, a perceived mismatch between visual and haptic roughness would not deter the observer from integrating visual and haptic slant. These results indicate that participants based their perceptual judgements on a feature-specific selection of information, suggesting that multisensory causal inference proceeds not at the object level but at the level of single object features. This article is part of the theme issue ‘Decision and control processes in multisensory perception’.

Funder

National Eye Institute

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft

Publisher

The Royal Society

Subject

General Agricultural and Biological Sciences,General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Both stimulus‐specific and configurational features of multiple visual stimuli shape the spatial ventriloquism effect;European Journal of Neuroscience;2024-01-17

2. How the brain controls decision making in a multisensory world;Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences;2023-08-07

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3