Kulturní a právní aspekty příčin a dopadů teze o technologické stagnaci

Author:

Hořeňovský Jan

Abstract

The dominant narrative that prevails in Western society today is that we live in a time of unprecedented technological progress that is historically unparalleled. We have social media networks, smartphones, the internet, and we are moving towards advanced artificial intelligence. However, little is said or written about the fact that this is also a narrative successfully challenged by several prominent, mainly American, authors. Those point out that progress over the last 50 years or so has been limited mainly to information technology, while in other areas, such as energy, transport, and construction, we are experiencing stagnation, resulting in the decline of the middle class and worsening life prospects, particularly for young people. This article is based on these critical perspectives and has two objectives. The first is to introduce a reader to the technological stagnation thesis. The second is to analyse the causes of this phenomenon and what role law and regulation might play in it. The ambition of this article is not to solve this problem entirely but rather to bring it to the attention of the academic community. If future discussions will be more about the impact of our actions on the issue of innovation, I would consider the objective of this article to be met. At the same time, I believe that this article may open the door to further research in the field of law, including potential empirical analysis.

Publisher

Charles University in Prague, Karolinum Press

Subject

Law

Reference53 articles.

1. Abigail Alliance for Better Access to Developmental Drugs v. von Eschenbach, 495 F.3d 695 (D.C. Cir. 2007), cert denied, 552 U.S. 1159 (2008).

2. Niklas Luhmann's Theory of Autopoietic Legal Systems

3. BENZ, E. Lessons from Fukushima: Strengthening the International Regulation of Nuclear Energy. William & Mary Environmental Law and Policy Review. 2012-2013, Vol. 37, No. 3, Art. 8, s. 845-883.

4. Is the force awakening?

5. BRAZIER, M. - CAVE, E. Medicine, Patients and the Law. London: Penguin Books, 2011.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3