Affiliation:
1. Mallareddy University
2. Koneru Lakshmaiah Educational Foundation
3. Dhanekula Institute of Engineering &
4. Technology
Abstract
In the current NDT 4.0 revolution, machine learning and artificial intelligence have emerged as the major enablers for non-destructive testing and evaluation (NDT&E) of industrial components. However, recent developments in active thermal NDT (TNDT) support its use as a practical method for checking a range of industrial components. Additionally, recent post-processing research in TNDT has developed several machine learning models to replace human interaction and offer automatic defect detection. However, the smaller area of the flaws and their related few thermal profiles than the wide sound area, leading to imbalanced datasets, make it difficult to train a supervised deep neural. Recently added to TNDT are anomaly detection models and one-class classifiers, both of which are commonly applied machine learning models to real-world issues. The accuracy and other important metrics in autonomous defect detection are influenced by the hyper-parameters of these models, such as contamination factor, volume of training data, and initialization parameter of the relevant model. The current paper investigates how initialization parameters affect these models’ TNDT capabilities for automated flaw detection. Using quadratic frequency modulated thermal wave imaging (QFMTWI), a carbon fiber-reinforced polymer specimen with variously sized artificially produced back-holes at different depths is examined. A good hyper-parameter for automatic flaw identification is chosen after qualitatively comparing testing accuracy, precision, recall, F-score, and probability.
Publisher
The Russian Academy of Sciences
Reference23 articles.
1. Aldrin C. John.Intelligence augmentation and Human Machine Interface (HMI) best practices for NDT 4.0 reliability / In ASNT Annual Conference, Westgate Las Vegas Resort & Casino, Wsetgs Las Vegas, Nevada. 2019.
2. Maldague X.P.V. Theory and Practice of Infrared Technology for Non-Destructive Testing. New York: Wiley, 2001.
3. Ciampa Francesco, Mahmoodi Pooya, Pinto Fulvio, Meo Michele. Recent advances in active infrared thermography for non-destructive testing of aerospace components // Sensors 18. 2018. No. 2. P. 609.
4. He Yunze, Deng Baoyuan, Wang Hongjin, Cheng Liang, Zhou Ke, Cai Siyuan, Ciampa Francesco. Infrared machine vision and infrared thermography with deep learning: A review // Infrared Physics & Technology. 2021. V. 116. P. 103754.
5. Luo Q, Gao B, Woo WL, Yang Y. Temporal and spatial deep learning network for infrared thermal defect detection // NDT & E International. 2019. V. 108. P. 102164.