Author:
Liaw Gwenisha J.,Kim Sujin,Alais David
Abstract
AbstractEarly models of multisensory integration posited that cross-modal signals only converged in higher-order association cortices and that vision automatically dominates. However, recent studies have challenged this view. In this study, the significance of the alignment of motion axes and spatial alignment across visual and tactile stimuli, as well as the effect of hand visibility on visuo-tactile interactions were examined. Using binocular rivalry, opposed motions were presented to each eye and participants were required to track the perceived visual direction. A tactile motion that was either a leftward or rightward sweep across the fingerpad was intermittently presented. Results showed that tactile effects on visual percepts were dependent on the alignment of motion axes: rivalry between up/down visual motions was not modulated at all by left/right tactile motion. On the other hand, visual percepts could be altered by tactile motion signals when both modalities shared a common axis of motion: a tactile stimulus could maintain the dominance duration of a congruent visual stimulus and shorten its suppression period. The effects were also conditional on the spatial alignment of the visual and tactile stimuli, being eliminated when the tactile device was displaced 15 cm away to the right of the visual stimulus. In contrast, visibility of the hand touching the tactile stimulus facilitated congruent switches relative to a visual-only baseline but did not present a significant advantage overall. In sum, these results show a low-level sensory interaction that is conditional on visual and tactile stimuli sharing a common motion axis and location in space.
Funder
Australian Research Council
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Linguistics and Language,Sensory Systems,Language and Linguistics,Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
Reference67 articles.
1. Alais, D. (2012). Binocular rivalry: Competition and inhibition in visual perception: Binocular rivalry. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 3(1), 87–103. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.151
2. Alais, D., & Blake, R. (2015). Binocular rivalry and perceptual ambiguity. In J. Wagemans (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Perceptual Organisation. : Oxford University Press.
3. Alais, D., Newell, F., & Mamassian, P. (2010a). Multisensory Processing in Review: From Physiology to Behaviour. Seeing and Perceiving, 23(1), 3–38. https://doi.org/10.1163/187847510X488603
4. Alais, D., van Boxtel, J. J., Parker, A., & van Ee, R. (2010b). Attending to auditory signals slows visual alternations in binocular rivalry. Vision Research, 50(10), 929–935. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2010.03.010
5. Albright, T. D. (1984). Direction and orientation selectivity of neurons in visual area MT of the macaque. Journal of Neurophysiology, 52(6), 1106–1130. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.1984.52.6.1106
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献