Validity and Reliability in Qualitative Research

Author:

ARSLAN Erdal

Abstract

The ability to demonstrate the validity and reliability of research findings is one of the important factors that determine the value of scientific research. Validity and reliability or trustworthiness are fundamental issues in scientific research whether qualitative, quantitative, or mixed research. It is a necessity for researchers to describe which criteria they have taken into consideration for the findings obtained during the validity and reliability of the research process. Even though currently, the validity and reliability of qualitative research findings are still controversial in some academic environments, particularly among positivists, qualitative research has lately gained momentum among researchers. Conceptual complexity in literature and unclear statements are misleading to the researchers who are interested in qualitative research, particularly those are new and yet learning qualitative research. Based on this viewpoint, the current study is aimed to present the specific information on validity and reliability in qualitative research, from an analytical perspective. In this context, the concepts of internal validity and external validity, internal consistency reliability, and external reliability used in quantitative research that are equivalents to credibility, transferability, dependability, and confirmability concepts in qualitative research are scrutinized. In addition, techniques to provide each criterion that researchers can use are also detailed.

Publisher

Pamukkale University

Subject

General Medicine

Reference32 articles.

1. Arslan, E. (2021). Turistik Tüketimin Kimlik İnşasındaki Rolü. (Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi). Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Eskişehir, Türkiye.

2. Blaikie, N. (1993). Approaches to social enquiry: Advancing knowledge. USA, Polit Press.

3. Braun, V., ve Clarke, V. (2013). Successful qualitative research: A practical guide for beginners. Sage.

4. Creswell, J. W. (2016). 30 essential skills for the qualitative researcher. Sage.

5. Czernek-Marszałek, K., & McCabe, S. (2022). Why qualitative papers get rejected by Annals of Tourism Research?. Annals of Tourism Research, 92(103438), 1-3.

Cited by 11 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3