Comparison between a Conventional and a New IRS Device in Terms of Air Entrainment: An Experimental and Numerical Analysis

Author:

Ganguly Viplove Ranjan1,Dash Sukanta K.1

Affiliation:

1. Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur

Abstract

An experimental study was conducted on a laboratory-scale new infrared suppression (IRS) device to assess the mass entrainment of ambient air into it under various operating conditions. A numerical analysis was also undertaken to assess the mass entrainment rate against pertinent input parameters independently. The numerical results were validated against the experimental data to ensure the reliability of the numerical analysis of the new IRS device at real scales. The numerical method solves the three-dimensional, incompressible Navier-Stokes equations; the mass continuity equation; and the two-equation-based eddy viscosity model for the turbulent k-epsilon equations in the flow field. Numerical assessment of the air entrainment was performed for the conventional and the newly proposed IRS devices. A number of experiments on the new IRS device were carried out under various operating conditions. From the numerical study, it was observed that the conventional IRS device performs better than the new IRS device up to a geometric ratio of 1.4 (which is the ratio of diameters of the successive funnels used in an IRS device). Beyond the geometric ratio of 1.4, the newly proposed IRS device outperforms the conventional one significantly. For the new IRS device, the maximum mass entrainment was found to occur when four funnels were used and the nozzle was kept in flush condition with the lower opening of the bottom-most funnel. Mass entrainment increases with the nozzle-exit Reynolds number for the range of values considered in the study.

Publisher

The Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers

Subject

Applied Mathematics,Mechanical Engineering,Ocean Engineering,Numerical Analysis,Civil and Structural Engineering

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3