Redefining Histological Cell Counts Using a Standardized Method: The Leuven Intestinal Counting Protocol

Author:

Ceulemans Matthias1,Huyghe Pauline1,De Hertogh Gert2,Cameron Raquel345,Schol Jolien16,Burns Grace L.345,Keely Simon345,Wauters Lucas16,Tack Jan16,Talley Nicholas J.345,Vanuytsel Tim16ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Translational Research Center for Gastrointestinal Disorders (TARGID), Department of Chronic Diseases and Metabolism (ChroMeta), Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium;

2. Laboratory of Translational Cell & Tissue Research, Department of Imaging & Pathology, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium;

3. College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, Australia;

4. National Health and Medical Research Council Centre for Research Excellence in Digestive Health, Newcastle, Australia;

5. Immune Health Research Program, Hunter Medical Research Institute, Newcastle, Australia; and

6. Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The diagnosis of eosinophilic gastrointestinal diseases is largely based on mucosal eosinophil counts, but thresholds and normal ranges beyond the esophagus are debated, calling for much-needed methodological standardization. We aimed to develop a standardized workflow for duodenal cell quantification and estimate duodenal eosinophil and mast cell numbers in healthy controls. METHODS: Software-based histological cell quantification using free-sized or fixed-sized regions was developed and applied to digitized hematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained slides from 58 individuals (healthy controls [HCs] and patients with functional dyspepsia). Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) compared inter-rater reliability between software-based and microscopic quantification. Reproducibility of the software-based method was validated in an independent cohort of 37 control and functional dyspepsia subjects. Eosinophil identification on H&E staining was compared to immunohistochemistry (IHC). Normal eosinophil (H&E) and mast cell (cKit) ranges were determined in 70 adult HCs. RESULTS: Eosinophil quantification on digitized slides demonstrated excellent (ICC = 0.909) and significantly improved reproducibility over microscopic evaluation (ICC = 0.796, P = 0.0014), validated in an independent cohort (ICC = 0.910). Duodenal eosinophils were more abundant around crypts than in villi (P < 0.0001), while counts were similar on matched H&E- and IHC-stained slides (P = 0.55). Mean ± SD (95th percentile) duodenal eosinophils and mast cells in HC were 228.8/mm2 ± 94.7 (402.8/mm2) and 419.5/mm2 ± 132.2 (707.6/mm2), respectively. DISCUSSION: We developed and validated a standardized approach to duodenal histological cell quantification, generalizable to various mucosal cell types. Implementation of software-based quantification identified 400 eosinophils/mm2 and 700 mast cells/mm2 as thresholds for abnormal duodenal infiltration.

Funder

Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek

Onderzoeksraad, KU Leuven

National Foundation for Medical Research and Innovation

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3