Trends in Detection of Adenoma and Sessile Serrated Lesions Over a Decade in a Community-Based Healthcare System

Author:

Liang Su-Ying1,Oscarson Brandon1,Kenkare Pragati1,Yan Sherry X.2,Mudiganti Satish2,Martinez Meghan C.1,Huang Edward S.3ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Center for Health Systems Research, Palo Alto, California, USA;

2. Center for Health Systems Research, Walnut Creek, California, USA;

3. Department of Gastroenterology, Palo Alto Medical Foundation, Sutter Health, San Jose, California, USA.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Adenoma detection rate (ADR) is an accepted benchmark for screening colonoscopy. Factors driving ADR and its relationship with sessile serrated lesions detection rate (SSLDR) over time remain unclear. We aim to explore patient, physician, and procedural influences on ADR and SSLDR trends. METHODS: Using a large healthcare system in northern California from January 2010 to December 2020, a total of 146,818 screening colonoscopies performed by 33 endoscopists were included. ADR and SSLDR were calculated over time using natural language processing. Logistic regression was used to calculate the odd ratios of patient demographics, physician attributes, and procedural details over time. RESULTS: Between 2010 and 2020, ADR rose from 19.4% to 44.4%, whereas SSLDR increased from 1.6% to 11.6%. ADR increased by 2.7% per year (95% confidence interval 1.9%–3.4%), and SSLDR increased by 1.0% per year (95% confidence interval 0.8%–1.2%). Higher ADR was associated with older age, male sex, higher body mass index, current smoker, higher comorbidities, and high-risk colonoscopy. By contrast, SSLDR was associated with younger age, female sex, white race, and fewer comorbidities. Patient and procedure characteristics did not significantly change over time (P-interaction >0.05). Longer years in practice and male physician were associated with lower ADR and SSLDR in 2010, but significantly attenuated over time (P-interaction <0.05). DISCUSSION: Both ADR and SSLDR have increased over time. Patient and procedure factors did not significantly change over time. Male endoscopist and longer years in practice had lower initial ADR and SSLDR, but significantly lessened over time.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Reference31 articles.

1. ACG clinical guidelines: Colorectal cancer screening 2021;Shaukat;Am J Gastroenterol,2021

2. Adenoma detection rate and risk of colorectal cancer and death;Corley;N Engl J Med,2014

3. Quality indicators for colonoscopy and the risk of interval cancer;Kaminski;N Engl J Med,2010

4. Trends in adenoma detection rates during the first 10 years of the German Screening Colonoscopy Program;Brenner;Gastroenterology,2015

5. 153 increasing adenoma detection rate over time in a national benchmarking registry;Pike;Gastrointest Endosc,2017

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3