REAL OPTIONS THEORY AND CLASSIFICATION OF PATIENTS BY DIAGNOSIS RELATED GROUPS: HOW THESE DIFFERENT FIELDS COULD RELATE?

Author:

Rocha Milena de Cássia1ORCID,Gonçalves Márcio Augusto2ORCID,Lawryshyn Yuri3ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Universidade Federal de Uberlândia, Brasil

2. Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Brasil

3. University of Toronto, Canadá

Abstract

ABSTRACT In a complex environment, the managers of hospital organizations should take hard decisions all the time. Therefore, tools and techniques, which seek to understand the past and project the future, are very important. In some situations, the complexity encountered requires the transfer of knowledge from other areas, to find solutions and develop tools that provide efficient management of resources. In this scenario, this article has the main objective to present a theoretical discussion that brings the relationship between the Theory of Real Options and the Diagnosis Related Groups, to identify possible points that underlie the use of real options in Diagnosis Related Groups. The results demonstrate that, with the patient's condition as the focus, both are applied in the hospital environment with the objective of supporting decision-making, but not together. In addition, the differences observed make the combination of some of its concepts relevant for decision-making.

Publisher

FapUNIFESP (SciELO)

Subject

Automotive Engineering

Reference68 articles.

1. Strategy and shareholder value creation: The real options frontier;AMRAM M.;Journal of Applied Corporate Finance,2000

2. Pathways to DRG-based hospital payment systems in Japan, Korea, and Thailand;ANNEAR P. L.;Health Policy,2018

3. Severity-of-illness measurement: applications in quality assurance and utilization review;ARONOW D. B.;Medical Care Review,1988

4. Investment in antiviral drugs: a real options approach;ATTEMA A. E.;Health economics,2010

5. The design and development of the diagnosis related groups;AVERILL R. F.;Topics in health record management,1984

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3