The calibration of esophageal pressure by proper esophageal balloon filling volume: A clinical study

Author:

Jiang Jing,Su Longxiang,Cheng Wei,Wang Chunfu,Rui Xi,Tang Bo,Zhang Hongmin,He Huaiwu,Long Yun

Abstract

BackgroundEsophageal pressure (Pes) can be used as a reliable surrogate for pleural pressure, especially in critically ill patients requiring personalized mechanical ventilation strategies. How to choose the proper esophageal balloon filling volume and then find the optimal value of esophageal pressure remains a challenge. The study aimed to assess the feasibility of catheters for Pes monitoring in mechanically ventilated patients.Materials and methodsTwelve patients under pressure-controlled mechanical ventilation were included in this study. Raw esophageal pressure was recorded at different balloon filling volumes. Then, the P-V curves were determined. VWORK was the intermediate linear section on the end-expiratory P-V curve, and VBEST was the filling volume providing the maximum difference between Pes at end-inspiration and end-expiration. The raw value of Pes was recorded, and the calibrated values of Pes were calculated by calculating the esophageal wall pressure (Pew) and esophageal elastance (Ees).ResultsTwenty-four series of Pes measurements were performed. The mean VMIN and VMAX were 2.17 ± 0.49 ml (range, 1.0–3.0 ml) and 6.79 ± 0.83 ml (range, 5.0–9.0 ml), respectively, whereas VBEST was 4.69 ± 0.16 ml (range, 2.0–8.0 ml). Ees was 1.35 ± 0.51 cm H2O/ml (range, 0.26–2.38 cm H2O/ml). The estimated Pew at VBEST was 3.16 ± 2.19 cm H2O (range, 0–7.97 cm H2O). Patients with a body mass index (BMI) ≥ 25 kg/m2 had a significantly lower VMAX (5.88 [5.25–6] vs. 7.25 [7–8] ml, p = 0.006) and a significantly lower VBEST (3.69 [2.5–4.38] vs. 5.19 [4–6] ml, p = 0.036) than patients with a BMI < 25 kg/m2. Patients with positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) ≥ 10 cm H2O had a lower VMIN and VBEST than patients with PEEP < 10 cm H2O, P > 0.05. Patients in the supine position had a higher esophageal pressure than those in the prone position with the same balloon filling volume.ConclusionsCalibration of esophageal pressure to identify the best filling volume of esophageal balloon catheters is feasible. The esophageal pressure can be influenced by BMI, PEEP, and position. It is necessary to titrate the optimal inflation volume again when the PEEP values or the positions change.

Publisher

Frontiers Media SA

Subject

General Medicine

Cited by 6 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3