Author:
Belova Tatyana,Islamov Artem E.,Rozhnov Artemiy A.,Zhdanov Sergei P.,Sokolova Ekaterina I.,Tsomartova Dibakhan A.
Abstract
IntroductionThis study investigates the relationship between science learning self-efficacy and science identity, examining how gender and science success moderate this relationship.MethodsUsing a quantitative approach with Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling, data from high school students in Moscow, Almetyevsk, Khabarovsk cities from Russia were analyzed.ResultsThe research highlights the significant positive impact of integrative science competence, practical science application, and science communication efficacy on science identity. Interestingly, gender did not significantly influence the efficacy-identity relationship, suggesting its minimal role in this context. Conversely, science success, particularly in conjunction with science communication efficacy, played a notable role, indicating a complex interplay that could affect students’ science identity.DiscussionThese findings emphasize the need for educational strategies that bolster students’ self-efficacy in science, catering to the development of a strong science identity. Future research should explore the nuanced effects of success and communication efficacy on science identity, aiming to inform interventions that support diverse and equitable participation in science education and careers.
Reference72 articles.
1. The association between the gender gap in science achievement and students’ perceptions of their own attitudes and capabilities;Al-Balushi;Eur. J. Math. Sci. Technol. Educ.,2022
2. Longitudinal analysis of the relations between opportunities to learn about science and the development of interests related to science;Alexander;Sci. Educ.,2012
3. Science interest, utility, self-efficacy, identity, and science achievement among high school students: an application of SEM tree;Alhadabi;Front. Psychol.,2021
4. Moving through the STEM pipeline: a systematic literature review of the gender inequality in Russian engineering;Antoshchuk;Monit. Public Opin. Econ. Soc. Changes,2021
5. Adolescent boys’ science aspirations: masculinity, capital, and power;Archer;J. Res. Sci. Teach.,2014