Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for cerebellar ataxia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Author:

Yin Lianjun,Wang Xiaoyu,Chen Lianghua,Liu Dandan,Li Haihong,Liu Zhaoxing,Huang Yong,Chen Junqi

Abstract

BackgroundRepetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation, a non-invasive brain stimulation technique, can manage cerebellar ataxia (CA) by suppressing cerebral cortical excitability. Hence, this study aimed to summarize the efficacy and safety of rTMS for CA patients by meta-analysis.MethodsThe PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for eligible studies published till 20 May 2023. Weighted mean difference (MD) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to assess the effect of rTMS treatment. Additionally, the quality of the included studies and the risk of bias were evaluated using the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) scale.ResultsOverall, eight studies involving 278 CA patients were included in this meta-analysis. rTMS could significantly improve the Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA) (MD: −2.00; 95% CI: −3.97 to −0.02, p = 0.05), International Cooperative Ataxia Rating Scale (ICARS) (MD: −3.96; 95% CI: −5.51 to −2.40, p < 0.00001), Timed Up-and-Go test (TUG) (MD: −1.54; 95% CI: −2.24 to −0.84, p < 0.0001), 10-m walk test (10 MWT) (MD10−m steps: −2.44; 95% CI: −4.14 to −0.73, p = 0.005), and Berg Balance Scale (BBS) (MD: 2.59; 95% CI: 1.15–4.03, p = 0.0004) as compared to sham stimulation. Active rTMS was not significantly different from sham rTMS in changing the duration (MD10−m time: −1.29; 95% CI: −7.98 to 5.41, p = 0.71). No severe adverse events were observed in both sham stimulation and active rTMS groups.ConclusionThis meta-analysis provides limited evidence that rTMS may be beneficial in treating CA patients. However, these findings should be treated with caution due to the limitations of the smaller sample size and the inconsistent approach and target of rTMS treatment. Therefore, more large-scale RCTs are required to further validate our analytical findings.Systematic review registrationhttps://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?RecordID=295726, identifier: CRD42022295726.

Publisher

Frontiers Media SA

Subject

Neurology (clinical),Neurology

全球学者库

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"全球学者库"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前全球学者库共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2023 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3